Cited by 34Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management Techniques

The relationship between greater mindfulness and less subjective experience of chronic pain: Mediating functions of pain management self‐efficacy and emotional intelligence

Open access
Wright, Carmel J., Schutte, Nicola S.·2014·Australian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Previous research shows a connection between greater mindfulness and less subjective experience of pain. The present study examined whether pain management self‐efficacy and emotional intelligence mediate this relationship in individuals experiencing chronic pain. Two hundred participants experiencing chronic pain completed measures of mindfulness, experience of pain, pain management self‐efficacy, and emotional intelligence. Greater mindfulness was associated with less subjective experience of pain, greater pain management self‐efficacy, and more emotional intelligence. More pain management self‐efficacy and higher emotional intelligence were associated with less subjective experience of pain. Emotional intelligence and pain management self‐efficacy significantly mediated the relationship between mindfulness and pain. The connection between greater mindfulness and less subjective experience of pain may be due to mindfulness providing a foundation for emotional functioning and behavioural regulation that result in reductions in the experience of pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajpy.12041

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The short form of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI-14) demonstrated adequate internal consistency and construct validity in healthy and clinical samples and significant inverse relationships with pain-related variables in individuals with chronic pain.

    “The FMI-14 demonstrated adequate internal consistency and construct validity in healthy and clinical samples [36, 37] and significant inverse relationships with pain-related variables in individuals with chronic pain [38].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bandurra, A. (1977). Self efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  2. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  3. Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., & Gallacher, D. (2006). Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European Journal of Pain, 10, 287-287.
  4. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 822-848.
  5. Dacre Pool, L., & Qualter, P. (2013). Emotional self-efficacy, gradu- ate employability, and career satisfaction: Testing the associations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65, 214-223.
  6. Downey, L. A., Johnston, P. J., Hansen, K., Birney, J., & Stough, C. (2010). Investigating the mediating effects of emotional intelli- gence and coping on problem behaviours in adolescents. Austral- ian Journal of Psychology, 62, 20-29.
  7. Merskey, H. (2000). Pain, psychogenesis, and psychiatric diagnosis. International Review of Psychiatry, 12, 99-102.
  8. Neubauer, A. C., & Freudenthaler, H. H. (2005). Models of emo- tional intelligence. In R. Schultz & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: An international handbook (pp. 31-50). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.
  9. Nicholas, M. K. (1989). Self-efficacy and chronic pain. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society, St.
  10. Nicholas, M. K. (2007). The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account. European Journal of Pain, 11, 153-163.
  11. Petrides, K. V., Pita, R., & Kokkinaki, F. (2007). The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 273-289.
  12. Ruiz-Aranda, D., Salguero, J. M., & Fernandez-Berrocal, P. (2011). Emotional intelligence and acute pain: The mediating effect of negative affect. Journal of Pain, 12, 1190-1196.
  13. Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2013a). Increasing emotional intel- ligence through training: Current status and future directions. International Journal of Emotional Education, 5, 56-72.
  14. Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2013b). Adaptive emotional func- tioning: A comprehensive model of emotional intelligence. In C. Mohiyeddini (Ed.), Psychology of emotions (pp. 469-488). Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers.
  15. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., & Bhullar, N. (2009). The assessing emotions scale. In C. Stough, D. Saklofske, & J. Parker (Eds.), The assessment of emotional intelligence (pp. 119-135). New York: Springer.
  16. Schutte, N. S., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Hine, D. W., Foster, R., Cauchi, A., & Binns, C. (2010). Experiential and rational processing styles, emotional intelligence and wellbeing. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62, 14-19.
  17. Strand, L. I., Ljunggren, A. E., Bogen, B., Ask, T., & Johnsen, T. B. (2008). The short form McGill Pain Questionnaire as an outcome measure: Test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change. European Journal of Pain, 12, 917-925.
  18. Wu, A., Tang, C. S., & Yogo, M. (2013). Death anxiety, altruism, self-efficacy, and organ donation intention among Japanese college students: A moderated mediation analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65, 115-123.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, C. J., & Schutte, N. S.
Affiliations
University of New England (AU)
Corresponding author
Schutte, Nicola S.
Venue
Australian Journal of Psychology
Published
2014-09-01
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
181-186
ISSN
  • 0004-9530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9536
OpenAlex
W2106136031
Cited by
34
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
mindfulness, chronic pain, emotional intelligence, subjective pain, mediation, pain coping, emotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review