Cited by 640Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Brain Mechanisms Supporting the Modulation of Pain by Mindfulness Meditation

Open access
Zeidan, Fadel, Martucci, Katherine T., Kraft, Robert A., Gordon, Nakia S., McHaffie, John G., Coghill, Robert C.·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The subjective experience of one's environment is constructed by interactions among sensory, cognitive, and affective processes. For centuries, meditation has been thought to influence such processes by enabling a nonevaluative representation of sensory events. To better understand how meditation influences the sensory experience, we used arterial spin labeling functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the neural mechanisms by which mindfulness meditation influences pain in healthy human participants. After 4 d of mindfulness meditation training, meditating in the presence of noxious stimulation significantly reduced pain unpleasantness by 57% and pain intensity ratings by 40% when compared to rest. A two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA was used to identify interactions between meditation and pain-related brain activation. Meditation reduced pain-related activation of the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify brain regions associated with individual differences in the magnitude of meditation-related pain reductions. Meditation-induced reductions in pain intensity ratings were associated with increased activity in the anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula, areas involved in the cognitive regulation of nociceptive processing. Reductions in pain unpleasantness ratings were associated with orbitofrontal cortex activation, an area implicated in reframing the contextual evaluation of sensory events. Moreover, reductions in pain unpleasantness also were associated with thalamic deactivation, which may reflect a limbic gating mechanism involved in modifying interactions between afferent input and executive-order brain areas. Together, these data indicate that meditation engages multiple brain mechanisms that alter the construction of the subjectively available pain experience from afferent information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5791-10.2011

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reductions in pain intensity from mindfulness-based pain relief are associated with heightened activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and orbitofrontal cortex, while reductions in pain unpleasantness are associated with attenuated thalamus activity.

    “The neural mechanisms of mindfulness-based pain relief have demonstrated that reductions of pain intensity are associated with heightened activity of the anterior cingulate cortex, the anterior insula, and the orbitofrontal cortex, while reductions in pain unpleasantness are associated with attenuated activity of the thalamus.32”

    From Mechanisms of mindfulness in patients with migraine: Results of a qualitative study. (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness meditation-related pain reductions are associated with activation of perigenual ACC, OFC, and anterior insula.

    “Brain imaging has shown that mindfulnessmeditation-related pain reductions are associated with activation of the perigenual ACC, OFC, and anterior insula (Zeidan et al., 2011;Zeidan et al., 2015).”

    From Mindfulness-meditation-based pain relief is not mediated by endogenous opioids (2016) · cites this paper as Zeidan et al., 2011

    The Results (Post-Meditation Training: MRI Session 2 Analyses; page unavailable) associate greater pain-intensity reductions with activation of the ACC and right anterior insula, and greater pain-unpleasantness reductions with OFC activation. The copy does not identify the pain-reduction-associated ACC activation as perigenual; the Discussion instead describes mid-cingulate activation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study was designed with >80% power to detect a significant difference between groups on pain ratings with 16 subjects per group.

    “Based on our previous studies (Zeidan et al., 2010a;Zeidan et al., 2011;Zeidan et al., 2015) and sample size determination software (G*power, 3.1), 16 subjects per group were considered sufficient to detect a signifi-cant difference (large effect size ϭ ␩ p 2 ϭ.14) between groups on a twosided, 0.05 test of proportions [repeated-measures (RM)”

    From Mindfulness-meditation-based pain relief is not mediated by endogenous opioids (2016) · cites this paper as Zeidan et al., 2011

    The Results (Post-Meditation Training: MRI Session 2 Analyses; page unavailable) report a significant, large reduction in pain ratings, which could serve as prior evidence for the citing authors’ sample-size calculation. The cited paper does not report >80% power or a design with 16 subjects per group: Methods (Subjects; page unavailable) says 15 participants completed it, and the Discussion (Limitations; page unavailable) calls it a within-group design. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness meditation deactivates the thalamus.

    “Specifically, mindfulness meditation significantly deactivates the thalamus (Zeidan et al., 2011;Zeidan et al., 2015), potentially reflecting cognitive gating of the transmission of sensory information to the cortex (Zeidan et al., 2011;Zeidan et al., 2012).”

    From Mindfulness-meditation-based pain relief is not mediated by endogenous opioids (2016) · cites this paper as Zeidan et al., 2011

    The Results (Post-Meditation Training: MRI Session 2 Analyses) report that participants with the greatest reductions in pain unpleasantness showed the greatest thalamic deactivation during meditation with noxious heat. The Discussion describes this as widespread deactivation and proposes a possible sensory-filtering mechanism. The paper supports thalamic deactivation associated with pain relief, but the cited passages do not establish the broader claim that meditation significantly deactivates the thalamus as a general effect. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness meditation has been shown to reduce the subjective pain experience in healthy controls.

    “While mindfulness meditation has been shown to attenuate the subjective pain experience in healthy controls,31, 32”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Allison PD 2002 Missing data Thousand Oaks, Calif Sage Publications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeidan, F., Martucci, K. T., Kraft, R. A., Gordon, N. S., McHaffie, J. G., & Coghill, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Marquette University (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Zeidan, Fadel
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-04-06
Volume
31
Issue
14
Pages
5540-5548
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2151568754
Cited by
640
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 37
FWCI
47.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wake Forest University
  • Mind and Life Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-39426, R01NS039426)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, pain modulation, pain unpleasantness, pain intensity, primary somatosensory cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, orbitofrontal cortex, thalamus, arterial spin labeling, individual differences, meditation training
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Individuality, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Pain, Pain Measurement, Physical Stimulation, Psychophysics, Regression Analysis, Pain Threshold, Meditation, Young Adult, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review