Cited by 39Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

A New Paradigm of Youth Recovery: Implications for Youth Mental Health Service Provision

Open access
Rayner, Sean, Thielking, Monica, Lough, Richard·2018·Australian Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The recovery model and practice orientation is promoted as a central feature of mental health service provision across the English speaking world. Yet the model relies on adult frameworks and its applicability to the youth recovery experience has not been established. The current qualitative study explored the common themes in the recovery experiences of 15 young people aged 18–23-years with severe mental health conditions from the Eastern Metropolitan Region of Melbourne, Australia. The aim of the study was to develop a thematic model of youth recovery utilising the experiences of young people with severe mental illness. These findings are then discussed in relation to common themes found in adult recovery research and in regard to the current understanding of young people and recovery. Qualitative data was inductively coded into a thematic model of youth recovery forming two overarching themes. The first was defined as ecological systems (ES) including three subthemes (personal, systemic, and macro). The second was defined as youth recovery processes drawing narratives from across the ES to form five subthemes (self‐belief and resilience; responsibility and personal agency; identity, awareness and acceptance; connection; and hope and positive expectations). The resulting themes revealed the critical importance of the ecological context in the personal recovery experiences of young people. It is contended that recovery in this stage of the lifespan is best conceptualised within this ecological framework. Implications for youth recovery conceptualisation and mental health service delivery are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajpy.12206

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been less evaluative research on the impact of the help-seeking process itself, specifically how young people make meaning of these experiences and how this meaning-making affects their mental health and future help-seeking decisions.

    “In addition, while much of the literature has focused on help-seeking barriers and facilitators, there has been less evaluative research on the impact of the help-seeking process itself-specifically how young people make meaning of these experiences, and how this meaning-making affects both their mental health and future help-seeking decisions (Law et al. 2020; Rayner et al. 2018).”

    From "You Have the Choice of Whether You're Going to Get Help or Attempt Suicide": Exploring the Process and Impact of Mental Health Help-Seeking with Young People (16–25 Years) (2025) · cites this paper as Rayner et al. 2018

    The “Recovery and young people” section says research on young people’s recovery experiences is scarce, and “Bottom-up exploration of young people’s recovery experiences” discusses a study of early mental-health-service use. But the paper does not establish the claimed comparison with research on help-seeking barriers and facilitators, or address how meaning-making about help-seeking affects mental health and future help-seeking decisions. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]1. Alegria, M., Jackson, J., Kessler, R., & Takeuchi, D. (2001-2003). Collaborative psychiatric epidemiology surveys, United States. Prince- ton, NJ: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20240.v8 · DOI
  2. [3]3. Anthony, W. A. (1991). Recovery from mental illness: The new vision of services researchers. Innovations and Research, 1(1), 13-14.
  3. [17]17. Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., Stone, M., & Templeton, J. (2001). Ado- lescence and emerging adult-hood: The critical passage ways to adulthood. In M. H. Bornstein, L. Davidson, & C. L. Keyes (Eds.), Well-being: Positive development across the life-span. (pp. 383-406). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rayner, S., Thielking, M., & Lough, R.
Affiliations
  • Youth and Family Services, Each Social and Community Health, Melbourne, Australia,
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Rayner, Sean
Venue
Australian Journal of Psychology
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
330-340
ISSN
  • 0004-9530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9536
OpenAlex
W2804844092
Cited by
39
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
recovery model, severe mental illness, youth, ecosystems, personal recovery, resilience, individual agency, hope, identity, social connectedness, mental health service delivery, recovery-oriented care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review