Cited by 108Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth Policy Implementation Science

Promoting recovery-oriented practice in mental health services: a quasi-experimental mixed-methods study

Open access
Gilburt, Helen, Slade, Mike, Bird, Victoria, Oduola, Sheri, Craig, Tom KJ·2013·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recovery has become an increasingly prominent concept in mental health policy internationally. However, there is a lack of guidance regarding organisational transformation towards a recovery orientation. This study evaluated the implementation of recovery-orientated practice through training across a system of mental health services. METHODS: The intervention comprised four full-day workshops and an in-team half-day session on supporting recovery. It was offered to 383 staff in 22 multidisciplinary community and rehabilitation teams providing mental health services across two contiguous regions. A quasi-experimental design was used for evaluation, comparing behavioural intent with staff from a third contiguous region. Behavioural intent was rated by coding points of action on the care plans of a random sample of 700 patients (400 intervention, 300 control), before and three months after the intervention. Action points were coded for (a) focus of action, using predetermined categories of care; and (b) responsibility for action. Qualitative inquiry was used to explore staff understanding of recovery, implementation in services and the wider system, and the perceived impact of the intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 intervention group team leaders post-training and an inductive thematic analysis undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 342 (89%) staff received the intervention. Care plans of patients in the intervention group had significantly more changes with evidence of change in the content of patient's care plans (OR 10.94. 95% CI 7.01-17.07) and the attributed responsibility for the actions detailed (OR 2.95, 95% CI 1.68-5.18). Nine themes emerged from the qualitative analysis split into two superordinate categories. 'Recovery, individual and practice', describes the perception and provision of recovery orientated care by individuals and at a team level. It includes themes on care provision, the role of hope, language of recovery, ownership and multidisciplinarity. 'Systemic implementation', describes organizational implementation and includes themes on hierarchy and role definition, training approaches, measures of recovery and resources. CONCLUSIONS: Training can provide an important mechanism for instigating change in promoting recovery-orientated practice. However, the challenge of systemically implementing recovery approaches requires further consideration of the conceptual elements of recovery, its measurement, and maximising and demonstrating organizational commitment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-13-167

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coding by consensus is most consistently used as a measure of reliability in qualitative data analysis in the mental health services area.

    ““Coding by consensus” in this way by regularly meeting to discuss procedures for assigning codes to segments of data and resolving differences in coding procedures is most consistently used as a measure of reliability in qualitative data analysis in the mental health services area [52,53,54].”

    From A Qualitative Study of Participant Feedback on an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Group-Based Intervention for Parents of Youth with Anxiety Disorders. (2026) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Methods > Data collection and analysis passage says the research team discussed its developing coding frame until reaching consensus, supporting this study as an example of consensus-based qualitative coding in mental health services. It does not say that coding by consensus is the most consistently used reliability measure, or describe regular meetings to resolve differences in coding procedures. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Slade M Personal recovery and mental illness 2009 Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilburt, H., Slade, M., Bird, V., Oduola, S., & Craig, T. K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gilburt, Helen
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2013-06-13
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
167-167
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062382422
Cited by
107
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
18.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Guy's and St Thomas' Charity
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
recovery-oriented care, recovery, mental health services, employee training, organizational change, care planning, multidisciplinary team, implementation, employee perceptions, hope, organizational commitment
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Health Personnel, Humans, Mental Health Services, Organizational Innovation, Primary Health Care, Program Evaluation, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review