Cited by 15Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and Research

Long-Term Immunosuppression After Solitary Islet Transplantation Is Associated With Preserved C-Peptide Secretion for More Than a Decade

Open access
Blau, J.E., Abegg, M.R., Flegel, W.A., Zhao, X., Harlan, D.M., Rother, K.I.·2015·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

We report on two patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after solitary islet transplantation in 2001. They received steroid-sparing immunosuppression (daclizumab, sirolimus, and tacrolimus according to the Edmonton protocol). Both patients became insulin independent for 2 years: Patient A, a 42-year-old female with a 12-year history of T1D, received two islet infusions; patient B, a 53-year-old female with a 40-year T1D history, received one islet infusion. Pretransplant, both had undetectable C-peptide concentrations and frequent and severe hypoglycemia. Pretransplant, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 7.8% and 8.8% and insulin requirements were 0.47 and 0.33 units/kg/day, respectively. Posttransplant, C-peptide levels remained detectable while immunosuppression was continued, but decreased over time. Insulin was re-started 2 years posttransplant in both patients. Since patient A's glycemia and insulin requirements trended toward pretransplant levels, immunosuppression was discontinued after 13 years. This resulted in a sudden cessation of C-peptide secretion. Patient B continues on immunosuppression, has better HbA1c, and half the insulin requirement compared to pretransplant. Both patients no longer experience severe hypoglycemia. Herein, we document blood glucose concentrations over time (>30 000 measurements per patient) and β cell function based on C-peptide secretion. Despite renewed insulin dependence, both patients express satisfaction with having undergone the procedure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ajt.13383

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Immunosuppressive drugs used for whole organ transplants can successfully retain graft viability but can have serious side-effects, including an increased risk of infection and cancer as well as less severe but uncomfortable symptoms.

    “While these drugs can successfully retain graft viability, they also can have serious side-effects, including an increased risk of infection and cancer as well as less severe but uncomfortable symptoms.”

    From Developments in stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy for treating type 1 diabetes (2023) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Case Reports > Complications section describes immunosuppression-related mouth ulcers, a cellulitis episode requiring hospitalization and antibiotics, and declining renal function. The Discussion and Patient A report support preservation of islet graft function during immunosuppression, but the paper does not address increased cancer risk or establish an increased infection risk in whole-organ transplant recipients. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blau, J. E., Abegg, M. R., Flegel, W. A., Zhao, X., Harlan, D. M., & Rother, K. I.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Rother, K.I.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
2995-3001
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1855140684
Cited by
15
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Transplantation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Intramural Research Program
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
islet transplantation, type 1 diabetes, long-term immunosuppression, C-peptide secretion, beta-cell function, daclizumab, rapamycin, tacrolimus, Edmonton protocol, insulin independence, hypoglycemia, insulin requirement
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunosuppression Therapy, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Postoperative Care, Quality of Life, Sampling Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review