Cited by 8Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsHormonal and reproductive studies

The physician’s gender influences the results of the diagnostic workup for erectile dysfunction

Open access
Rastrelli, Giulia, Cipriani, Sarah, Craparo, Andrea, De Vincentis, Sara, Granata, Antonio R. M., Spaggiari, Giorgia, Simoni, Manuela, Maggi, Mario +1 more·2020·Andrology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the well-known influence of psychological and situational factors on erectile dysfunction, the influence of the physician's gender on the andrological workup has never been investigated so far. OBJECTIVES: To investigate physician's gender influence on the erectile dysfunction diagnostic workup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection. We evaluate a consecutive series of erectile dysfunction patients: 95 at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (UNIMORE) and 1808 at the University of Florence (UNIFI). In the UNIMORE cohort (Cohort 1), intracavernousal injection test was performed in case of suspected vascular pathogenic component. In the UNIFI cohort (Cohort 2), patients were evaluated by structured interview on erectile dysfunction and ANDROTEST. Both cohorts were divided into two groups according to the gender of the physician who performed the intracavernousal injection test or the structured interview. RESULTS: In Cohort 1, patients who had the intracavernousal injection test performed by a female physician had a significantly higher probability of obtaining a better intracavernousal injection test response. In Cohort 2, patients interviewed by female physician more frequently reported to have a conflictual couple relationship and a reduced frequency of climax in their partners. However, they reported less difficulties in achieving and maintaining erection, higher frequency of autoeroticism, lower occurrence of erectile dysfunction during masturbation and lower impairment in morning erections. CONCLUSIONS: Physician's gender affects the results obtained during the erectile dysfunction diagnostic workup. Men interviewed by a female physician describe a less severe erectile dysfunction probably as attempt to defend their own virility. On the other hand, the presence of a male physician during intracavernousal injection test is associated to a worse response suggesting a possible unconscious competition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/andr.12759

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kubin M, Wagner G, Fugl-Meyer AR. Epidemiology of erectile dys- function. Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:63-71.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rastrelli, G., Cipriani, S., Craparo, A., De Vincentis, S., Granata, A. R. M., Spaggiari, G., Simoni, M., Maggi, M., & Santi, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • Unit of Endocrinology Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena (IT)
Corresponding author
Santi, Daniele
Venue
Andrology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-29
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
671-679
ISSN
  • 2047-2919 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2927
OpenAlex
W2999858080
Cited by
8
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Andrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, physician gender, diagnostic workup, sexual function assessment, couple relationships, sexual behavior, male physicians, female physicians, virility
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review