The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Internet of Landlords: Digital Platforms and New Mechanisms of Rentier Capitalism
Open accessAbstract
Digital platforms are a nearly ubiquitous form of intermediary and infrastructure in society. By positioning platforms in the geographical political economy/ecology literature, this paper provides a critical analysis of platforms as a dominant form of rentier in contemporary capitalism. In doing so, I extend this work on rent theory beyond applications to land and nature so that it also includes platforms and data. I argue that the rapid rise of the “X‐as‐a‐service” business model across nearly all sectors of the economy is creating rentier relations by another name. This model is premised on the platform latching onto and inserting itself into the production, circulation, or consumption process, thus creating opportunities to capture value. To better understand the operations and implications of platforms, I outline three key mechanisms: data extraction, digital enclosure, and capital convergence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x · Cited by 2,355
Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation
Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2017) · Finance and Society · doi:10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936 · Cited by 989 · cited 3×
“Beyond providing their users with new communication networks and the convenience of on-demand services, platforms are the business model and machinery for the “ intermediation and capi-talisation of digital economic circulation ” (Langley and Leyshon 2017:11).”
Background
Cited by
From extractivism to global extractivism: the evolution of an organizing concept
Chagnon, C. W., Durante, F., Gills, B. K., Hagolani-Albov, S. E., Hokkanen, S., Kangasluoma, S. M. J., Konttinen, H., Kröger, M., LaFleur, W., Ollinaho, O., et al. (2022) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2069015 · Cited by 377
Big Tech: Four Emerging Forms of Digital Rentiership
Birch, K., & Cochrane, D. T. (2022) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2021.1932794 · Cited by 121
Mapping modern economic rents: the good, the bad, and the grey areas
Mazzucato, M., Ryan-Collins, J., & Gouzoulis, G. (2023) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bead013 · Cited by 54
The Gentrification of Airbnb: Closing Rent Gaps Through the Professionalization of Hosting
Bosma, J. R., & van Doorn, N. (2024) · Space and Culture · doi:10.1177/12063312221090606 · Cited by 42
AI and Aphasia in the Digital Age: A Critical Review
Privitera, A. J., Ng, S. H. S., Kong, A. P.-H., & Weekes, B. S. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14040383 · Cited by 26
Platform cooperativism and freedom as non-domination in the gig economy
Christiaens, T. (2025) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/14748851241227121 · Cited by 24
Playing for keeps: digital labor and blockchain precarity in play-to-earn gaming
Kuo Siong Tan, G. (2024) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104009 · Cited by 16
The Dismal Harvest: The Uneven Landscapes of AI in Agriculture
Cieslik, K. (2026) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.70043 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadowski, J.
- Venue
- Antipode
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 562-580
- ISSN
- 0066-4812 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8330
- OpenAlex
- W3003331254
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 77.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.