Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 713

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never‐ending story?

Open access
Ringø, E., Zhou, Z., Vecino, J.L.G., Wadsworth, S., Romero, J., Krogdahl, Å., Olsen, R.E., Dimitroglou, A., Foey, A., Davies, S., Owen, M., Lauzon, H.L., Martinsen, L.L., De Schryver, P., Bossier, P., Sperstad, S., Merrifield, D.L.·2016·Aquaculture Nutrition

Abstract

It is well known that healthy gut microbiota is essential to\npromote host health and well-being. The intestinal microbiota of endothermic animals as well as fish are classified as\nautochthonous or indigenous, when they are able to colonize\nthe host’s epithelial surface or are associated with the microvilli, or as allochthonous or transient (associated with digesta\nor are present in the lumen). Furthermore, the gut microbiota of aquatic animals is more fluidic than that of terrestrial vertebrates and is highly sensitive to dietary changes. In\nfish, it is demonstrated that [a] dietary form (live feeds or pelleted diets), [b] dietary lipid (lipid levels, lipid sources and\npolyunsaturated fatty acids), [c] protein sources (soybean\nmeal, krill meal and other meal products), [d] functional glycomic ingredients (chitin and cellulose), [e] nutraceuticals\n(probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and immunostimulants), [f]\nantibiotics, [g] dietary iron and [h] chromic oxide affect the\ngut microbiota. Furthermore, some information is available\non bacterial colonization of the gut enterocyte surface as a\nresult of dietary manipulation which indicates that changes\nin indigenous microbial populations may have repercussion\non secondary host–microbe interactions. The effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota is important to investigate, as the gastrointestinal tract has been suggested as one\nof the major routes of infection in fish. Possible interactions\nbetween dietary components and the protective microbiota\ncolonizing the digestive tract are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/anu.12346

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 713

Metadata

Authors
Ringø, E., Zhou, Z., Vecino, J. L. G., Wadsworth, S., Romero, J., Krogdahl, Å., Olsen, R. E., Dimitroglou, A., Foey, A., Davies, S., Owen, M., Lauzon, H. L., Martinsen, L. L., De Schryver, P., Bossier, P., Sperstad, S., & Merrifield, D. L.
Venue
Aquaculture Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-07
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
219-282
ISSN
  • 1353-5773 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2095
OpenAlex
W2147990122
Cited by
713
References
8
FWCI
13.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never‐ending story? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/anu.12346
The paper
Ringø, E., Zhou, Z., Vecino, J. L. G., Wadsworth, S., Romero, J., Krogdahl, Å., Olsen, R. E., Dimitroglou, A., Foey, A., Davies, S., Owen, M., Lauzon, H. L., Martinsen, L. L., De Schryver, P., Bossier, P., Sperstad, S., & Merrifield, D. L. (2016). Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never‐ending story? Aquaculture Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12346

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.