Cited by 76Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Does surgery for deep infiltrating bowel endometriosis improve fertility? A systematic review

Open access
Iversen, Maja L., Seyer‐Hansen, Mikkel, Forman, Axel·2017·Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Introduction: Reduced fertility is a major concern in women with endometriosis. The influence of surgery of deep infiltrating endometriosis ( DIE ) affecting the bowel wall on fertility is controversial and the literature on this field is heterogeneous. In this review we addressed whether surgery for bowel DIE improves the spontaneous pregnancy rate, and the results of in vitro fertilization ( IVF ), and the potential risk of such surgery. Material and methods: We conducted a literature search including the terms “deep”, “deep infiltrating”, “bowel”, rectovaginal”, “endometriosis”, “fertility”, “infertility” and “ IVF ” in PubMed. Results: No randomized controlled studies were found. Other publications of relevance included four retrospective and three prospective observational studies. Moreover, one retrospective study compared results of IVF treatment with or without previous surgery for bowel DIE . All studies reported detailed data on surgical complications. The poor data quality precluded firm conclusions. The results indicate, however, the possibility that surgery for bowel DIE may improve the spontaneous pregnancy rate, and positive effects on IVF outcome cannot be excluded. Such surgery will be associated with risk of major complications. Conclusion: The lack of proper data precludes conclusions on the potential role for bowel DIE surgery to improve the spontaneous pregnancy rate and results of IVF treatment. Positive effects cannot be excluded, but the definite risk of major complications must be taken into account.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aogs.13152

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No compelling evidence exists that operative laparoscopy for deep endometriosis improves fertility.

    “Although no compelling evidence exists that operative laparoscopy for deep endometriosis improves fertility, operative laparoscopy may represent a treatment option in symptomatic patients wishing to conceive (Meuleman et al., 2011; Vercellini et al., 2012; Iversen et al., 2017).”

    From ESHRE guideline: endometriosis (2022) · cites this paper as Iversen et al., 2017

    The Key message and Abstract (page not specified in our copy) say evidence for a fertility benefit from surgery is sparse and poor quality, with no randomized controlled studies and no firm conclusion. That supports the claim’s assessment of the evidence, but the review concerns deep infiltrating endometriosis affecting the bowel wall, not operative laparoscopy for deep endometriosis generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iversen, M. L., Seyer‐Hansen, M., & Forman, A.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Iversen, Maja L.
Venue
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-28
Volume
96
Issue
6
Pages
688-693
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2607271160
Cited by
76
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
deep infiltrating endometriosis, bowel endometriosis, endometriosis surgery, fertility, infertility, spontaneous pregnancy rate, IVF outcomes, surgical complications, rectovaginal endometriosis
MeSH terms
Endometriosis, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Female, Intestinal Diseases, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review