Cited by 32Digital Mental Health InterventionsStudent Stress and CopingMental Health Treatment and Access

Reducing distress in university students: A randomised control trial of two online interventions

Stallman, Helen M., Ohan, Jeneva L., Chiera, Belinda·2019·Australian Psychologist

Abstract

Objective University students experience high rates of distress and place increasing demands on provisions of support. Web‐based interventions may provide a low‐cost, accessible low intensity format to support students to make changes to improve their health and wellbeing. Method This study evaluated the efficacy of two web‐based interventions in the lead‐up to final exams: one on general mental health (thedesk) and one specifically focused on coping with distress (Care · Collaborate · Connect: Student Success). Because most students believe that stress is a normal part of the student experience (which might inhibit the effectiveness of support that is provided), we hypothesised that a program emphasising coping with stress would be more effective than a general program. Participants were 70 students with self‐reported elevated levels of psychological distress who were randomly assigned to one of the …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ap.12375

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A strategy allowing students to access multiple exercises at the same time and in any order and consume content most relevant to their unique mental health needs has been previously proven successful in decreasing stress in university students in an Australian program called "thedesk".

    “Such a strategy has been previously proven successful in decreasing stress in university students in an Australian program for students called “thedesk” [48].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stallman, H. M., Ohan, J. L., & Chiera, B.
Affiliations
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Stallman, Helen M.
Venue
Australian Psychologist
Published
2019-04-01
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
125-131
ISSN
  • 0005-0067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9544
OpenAlex
W2901608408
Cited by
32
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
psychological distress, university students, online intervention, digital mental health interventions, exam stress, stress coping, student well-being, general mental health, intervention efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review