Cited by 27Digital Mental Health InterventionsStudent Stress and CopingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Development of an Internet Intervention to Promote Wellbeing in College Students

Stallman, Helen M, Kavanagh, David J·2018·Australian Psychologist

Abstract

Objective: While tertiary students commonly experience distress that substantially impacts functioning and performance, few seek help. Innovative strategies are needed to promote wellbeing and address this distress. The current article describes the development, acceptability testing, and use of an Internet intervention to promote student wellbeing and resilience-thedesk. Method: Acceptability and useability of the program were evaluated by user analytics and focus groups. Results: In the first 3.5years, 118,000 individuals accessed the website and had 163,000 sessions averaging 5.3min and 6.9 accessed pages. Users' wellbeing scores were positively skewed, suggesting that the engaged content has broad relevance. While the percentage of people leaving the site after viewing the homepage was considered acceptable at 50%, there is significant room to improve engagement. Responses from consumer focus groups suggested high acceptability, perceived usability, and likely utility. Concerns included data security and, for international students, the need for greater direction on program use. Conclusions: While further research is needed to evaluate the effects of thedesk on wellbeing and distress, the current results suggest that it provides highly accessible support that is well accepted by most tertiary students and has the potential for use as a stand-alone intervention or, adjunctively, to increase the impact of other student support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ap.12246

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stallman, H. M., & Kavanagh, D. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Stallman, Helen M
Venue
Australian Psychologist
Published
2018-02-01
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
60-67
ISSN
  • 0005-0067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9544
OpenAlex
W2509683881
Cited by
27
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
online intervention, student well-being, university students, resilience, student distress, help-seeking, acceptability, usability, user engagement, data security, international students, student support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review