Cited by 49Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The essential role of mental imagery in cognitive behaviour therapy: What is old is new again

Saulsman, Lisa M., Ji, Julie L., Mcevoy, Peter M.·2019·Australian Psychologist

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to highlight the important role of mental imagery in contemporary cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT).MethodIn this narrative review, we define mental imagery based on cognitive science research, present the rationale for the incorporation of mental imagery within CBT, and outline four key applications of mental imagery within CBT practice (i.e., imagery‐enhanced thought records, imagery‐enhanced behavioural experiments, imaginal facilitation of behaviour change, and imagery rescripting), including emerging research supporting these varied applications.ResultsMental imagery is highly relevant to CBT practice because (a) it is a transdiagnostic cognitive maintaining factor of psychopathology; (b) it promotes cognitive specificity when working with clients; and (c) the emotional amplification properties of mental imagery, and its impacts on motivation and behaviour, make imagery a powerful facilitator of cognitive, affective, and behavioural change. Emerging research is promising regarding the potential for imagery to enhance treatment outcomes. However, further research is required to guide clinicians regarding how to best facilitate imagery interventions to maximise outcomes.ConclusionsImagery‐focused interventions are an essential part of a CBT practitioner's therapeutic repertoire. Mental imagery has the capacity to bring CBT to life, facilitating conditions important for engaging and effective psychotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ap.12406

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saulsman, L. M., Ji, J. L., & Mcevoy, P. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Saulsman, Lisa M.
Venue
Australian Psychologist
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
237-244
ISSN
  • 0005-0067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9544
OpenAlex
W2943697102
Cited by
49
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
mental imagery, cognitive behavioral therapy, imagery rescripting, thought records, behavioural experiments, imaginal exposure, behavior change, emotional amplification, motivation, transdiagnostic factors, psychotherapy engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review