Cited by 300Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyGenetics and Physical PerformanceSports Performance and Training

Biology of VO2max: looking under the physiology lamp

Lundby, C., Montero, D., Joyner, M.·2017·Acta Physiologica

Abstract

In this review, we argue that several key features of maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2 max) should underpin discussions about the biological and reductionist determinants of its interindividual variability: (i) training‐induced increases in VO 2 max are largely facilitated by expansion of red blood cell volume and an associated improvement in stroke volume, which also adapts independent of changes in red blood cell volume. These general concepts are also informed by cross‐sectional studies in athletes that have very high values for VO 2 max. Therefore, (ii) variations in VO 2 max improvements with exercise training are also likely related to variations in these physiological determinants. (iii) All previously untrained individuals will respond to endurance exercise training in terms of improvements in VO 2 max provided the stimulus exceeds a certain volume and/or intensity. Thus, genetic analysis and/or reductionist studies performed to understand or predict such variations might focus specifically on DNA variants or other molecular phenomena of relevance to these physiological pathways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apha.12827

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unexplained variance in ∆VO2max could be partially attributed to non-assessed adaptations modulating cardiac output and its distribution.

    “Yet, approximately half of the variance in ∆VO 2max remained unexplained, which could be partially attributed to non-assessed adaptations modulating cardiac output and its distribution (Boushel et al., 2014;Lundby et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lundby, C., Montero, D., & Joyner, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Lundby, C.
Venue
Acta Physiologica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-11-25
Volume
220
Issue
2
Pages
218-228
ISSN
  • 1748-1708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-1716
OpenAlex
W2557219951
Cited by
300
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Physiologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
VO2max, interindividual variability, exercise training response, erythrocyte volume, stroke volume, endurance training, untrained individuals, DNA variants
MeSH terms
Animals, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Humans, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Respiratory Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review