Cited by 85Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Leisure Time Activities and Mental Health in Informal Dementia Caregivers

Open access
Schüz, Benjamin, Czerniawski, Alana, Davie, Nicola, Miller, Lisa, Quinn, Michael G., King, Carolyn, Carr, Andrea, Elliott, Kate‐Ellen J. +2 more·2015·Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being

Abstract

Objectives Dementia prevalence and the demand for dementia care are increasing. Informal caregiving accounts for a large proportion of dementia care, but can come at high cost for caregivers. Informal dementia caregivers are at higher risk for mental health problems than the general population. This study examines whether perceived change in leisure activities is one working mechanism linking stress and burden experience in dementia caregiving to lower mental health (depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and reduced satisfaction with life), and whether there are group-based leisure activities that can buffer this detrimental effect. Methods A total of 346 informal Australian dementia caregivers (88.15% female, age 18-82 years) participated in an online study. Results Mediation and moderation analyses using multiple regression demonstrated that perceived changes in leisure activities linked caregiving stress and burden to lower mental health, and that membership in groups engaging in affiliation or social activities attenuates negative effects of caregiving. Conclusion Informal dementia caregivers benefit from satisfying leisure activities. In particular, engaging in social activities and self-help groups buffered the negative impact of caregiving.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aphw.12046

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schüz, B., Czerniawski, A., Davie, N., Miller, L., Quinn, M. G., King, C., Carr, A., Elliott, K. J., Robinson, A., & Scott, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
  • University of Tasmania Australia
Corresponding author
Schüz, Benjamin
Venue
Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-11
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
230-248
ISSN
  • 1758-0846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-0854
OpenAlex
W2152451984
Cited by
85
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Tasmanian Home and Community Care Program (S0017329)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
leisure, mental health, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, life satisfaction, caregiving stress, caregiver burden, social activity, self-help groups, mediation, moderation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Dementia, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Leisure Activities, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Self-Help Groups, Tasmania, Caregivers, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review