Cited by 414Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Depressive disorders in caregivers of dementia patients: A systematic review

Open access
Cuijpers, P.·2005·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Although depressive symptomatology has been well studied in caregivers of patients with dementia, depressive disorders have been examined much less. We conducted a systematic literature search in major bibliographical databases (Medline, Psychinfo, Dissertation Abstracts), and included studies examining caregivers of dementia patients that reported the prevalence of major depressive disorder, according to diagnostic criteria as assessed with a standardized psychiatric diagnostic interview. Ten studies with a total of 790 caregivers were identified (sample sizes: 22-147). In only one of the studies, a representative community sample was used. A total of 176 subjects (22.3%) had a depressive disorder (prevalence range from 0.15-0.32). In the three studies reporting differential prevalence rates for men and women somewhat smaller prevalence rates were found for men than for women. In six studies caregivers were compared to a (mostly matched) control group. The relative risks of having a depressive disorder in caregivers ranged from 2.80-38.68 (all RR's were significant). In the three prospective studies relatively high incidence rates were found (0.48). This study made it clear that prevalence and incidence of depressive disorders are increased in caregivers of dementia patients. More research is clearly needed in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607860500090078

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cuijpers, P.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Cuijpers, P.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2005-07
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
325-330
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2112611588
Cited by
414
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
depressive disorders, dementia caregivers, caregiver burden, major depressive disorder, prevalence, incidence, sex differences, relative risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Dementia, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Incidence, Prevalence, Epidemiologic Studies, Case-Control Studies, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review