Cited by 283Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Caregiver support groups in patients with dementia: a meta‐analysis

Chien, Ling‐Yu, Chu, Hsin, Guo, Jong‐Long, Liao, Yuan‐Mei, Chang, Lu‐I, Chen, Chiung‐Hua, Chou, Kuei‐Ru·2011·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: Meta‐analysis studies of specific types of support groups are limited. We conducted a review and assessment of the effectiveness of support groups for caregivers of demented patients, and examined the impact of support group characteristics. Methods: A search of multiple, electronic databases including the Cochrane Library, Medline, PUBMED, and others was conducted; studies published between 1998 and 2009 were collected. Thirty quantitative journal articles that were true and quasi‐experimental controlled trials on support groups for non‐professional caregivers, including mutual support, psychoeducational, and educational groups were analyzed. Outcome indicators were psychological well‐being, depression, burden, and social outcomes. Results: Support groups showed a significant positive effect on caregivers' psychological well‐being (Hedge's g = −0.44, 95% CI = −0.73, −0.15), depression (Hedge's g = −0.40, 95% CI = −0.72, −0.08), burden (Hedge's g = −0.23, 95% CI = −0.33, −0.13), and social outcomes (Hedge's g = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.09, 0.71). The use of theoretical models, and length and intensity of group sessions had a significant impact on the effect sizes for psychological well‐being and depression. Ratio of female participation (for psychological well‐being and depression) and average age (social outcomes) were significant predictor variables. Conclusions: Support groups benefit caregivers and findings of this meta‐analysis serve as immediate guidance for group facilitators. Future research should include additional outcome variables with our defined factors on effectiveness collected as demographic characteristic data for comparison. A more comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of support groups is indicated to enhance outcomes for caregivers and patients. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.2660

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most existing meta-analyses of carer interventions target one specific approach, such as CBT, educational interventions, support groups, technology-based CBT, or telephone counselling.

    “However, most of these reviews target one specific approach such as Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) (Vernooij-Dassen et al. , 2011), , educational interventions (Jensen et al. , 2015), support groups (Chien et al. , 2011), technology-based CBT (Scott et al. , 2016), and telephone counselling (Lins et al. , 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chien, L., Chu, H., Guo, J., Liao, Y., Chang, L., Chen, C., & Chou, K.
Affiliations
  • Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital (TW)
  • Tri-Service General Hospital (TW)
  • National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
  • Taipei Medical University (TW)
  • Meiho University (TW)
  • Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chou, Kuei‐Ru
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-09
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
1089-1098
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2077462002
Cited by
282
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
caregiver support groups, dementia, family caregivers, self-help groups, psychoeducational groups, caregiver burden, depression, psychological well-being, social outcomes, group facilitation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Dementia, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, Caregivers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review