Cited by 695Gastrointestinal motility and disordersInfant Health and DevelopmentInflammatory Bowel Disease

An Evidence-Based Position Statement on the Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

American College of Gastroenterology IBS Task Force·2009·The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ajg.2008.122

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
American College of Gastroenterology IBS Task Force
Venue
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2008-12-18
Volume
104
Issue
S1
Pages
S1-S35
ISSN
  • 0002-9270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-0241
OpenAlex
W2017321847
Cited by
694
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 70
FWCI
42.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2009-04-02)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, evidence-based care, treatment guidelines
MeSH terms
Humans, Evidence-Based Medicine, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review