Cited by 10Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyLivestock Farming and Management

Evaluation of total mixed ration silage with brewers grains for dairy buffalo in T arai, N epal

Sakai, Takashi, Devkota, Naba R., Oishi, Kazato, Hirooka, Hiroyuki, Kumagai, Hajime·2015·Animal Science Journal

Abstract

To investigate the effects of total mixed ration (TMR) silage, which contained brewers grain and rice straw as a substitute for conventional concentrate on feed intake and milk production in middle-to-late lactation buffaloes, four multiparous Murrah buffaloes were assigned to a 3 × 3 Latin square design experiment. The TMR silage, which had higher neutral and acid detergent fiber contents and digestibility than concentrate (P < 0.05) and similar crude protein (CP) and total digestible nutrient (TDN) contents with concentrate were used for the lactation experiment. The treatments were control (CTL) fed concentrate at 0.6% of body weight (BW), and T1 and T2 fed the TMR silage at 0.6 and 1.2% of BW on a dry matter (DM) basis, respectively, with rice straw ad libitum. Daily intakes of DM, CP and TDN, and BW change were higher in T2 than in CTL and T1 (P < 0.05). Although milk composition did not differ among the treatments, milk yield (MY) was higher in T2 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in MY/DM intake and MY/TDN intake among the treatments. The increase of BW and MY in middle-to-late lactation buffaloes might have been due to high TDN intake from supplementary TMR silage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/asj.12374

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mixing high-moisture soybean residue with dry corn stover silage reduces the moisture content and eliminates some of the undesirable fermentation characteristics of mixed silage, such as undesirable odor and low digestibility, and these characteristics can improve some of the undesirable responses of cattle to forage.

    “Mixing high-moisture SR with dry CS silage reduces the moisture content and eliminates some of the undesirable fermentation characteristics of mixed silage, such as undesirable odor and low digestibility, and these characteristics can improve some of the undesirable responses of cattle to forage [6].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakai, T., Devkota, N. R., Oishi, K., Hirooka, H., & Kumagai, H.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • Tribhuvan University (NP)
Corresponding author
Kumagai, Hajime
Venue
Animal Science Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-17
Volume
86
Issue
10
Pages
884-890
ISSN
  • 1344-3941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-0929
OpenAlex
W2136356413
Cited by
9
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Science Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24405041)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
Keywords
total mixed ration silage, brewer's grains, dairy buffalo, Murrah buffalo, lactation, milk yield, feed intake, rice straw, concentrate replacement, fiber digestibility, weight gain, milk composition, Tarai
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Buffaloes, Cattle, Edible Grain, Eating, Female, Lactation, Nepal, Silage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review