Cited by 289Medication Adherence and ComplianceLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Impact of statin adherence on cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes: a systematic review

Open access
De Vera, Mary A., Bhole, Vidula, Burns, Lindsay C., Lacaille, Diane·2014·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Aims: While suboptimal adherence to statin medication has been quantified in real‐world patient settings, a better understanding of its impact is needed, particularly with respect to distinct problems of medication taking. Our aim was to synthesize current evidence on the impacts of statin adherence, discontinuation and persistence on cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of peer‐reviewed studies using a mapped search of M edline, E mbase and I nternational P harmaceutical A bstracts databases. Observational studies that met the following criteria were included: defined patient population; statin adherence exposure; defined study outcome [i.e. cardiovascular disease ( CVD ), mortality]; and reporting of statin‐specific results. Results: Overall, 28 studies were included, with 19 studies evaluating outcomes associated with statin adherence, six with statin discontinuation and three with statin persistence. Among adherence studies, the proportion of days covered was the most widely used measure, with the majority of studies reporting increased risk of CVD (statistically significant risk estimates ranging from 1.22 to 5.26) and mortality (statistically significant risk estimates ranging from 1.25 to 2.54) among non‐adherent individuals. There was greater methodological variability in discontinuation and persistence studies. However, findings of increased CVD (statistically significant risk estimates ranging from 1.22 to 1.67) and mortality (statistically significant risk estimates ranging from 1.79 to 5.00) among nonpersistent individuals were also consistently reported. Conclusions: Observational studies consistently report an increased risk of adverse outcomes associated with poor statin adherence. These findings have important implications for patients and physicians and emphasize the importance of monitoring and encouraging adherence to statin therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bcp.12339

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Poor adherence to lipid-lowering medications remains a barrier in reducing the substantial global burden of cardiovascular disease.

    “Despite their effectiveness in primary and secondary prevention of CVD, poor adherence to LLMs remains a barrier in reducing the substantial global burden of CVD.2,3”

    From Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Introduction reports substantial poor adherence to statins, and the Abstract reports higher CVD and mortality risks among non-adherent patients. This supports poor statin adherence as a barrier to better CVD outcomes, but the review does not establish the claim for lipid-lowering medications generally or quantify its effect on the global CVD burden. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The main reason for statin non-adherence/discontinuation relates to the onset of (perceived) side effects.

    “Given that the main reason for statin non-adherence/discontinuation relates to the onset of (perceived) side effects”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Urquhart J, Vrijens B. New findings about ptaient adherence to prescribed drug dosing regimens: an introduction to pharmionics. Eur J Hosp Pharm Sci 2005; 11: 103-06.
  2. Howell N, Trotter R, Mottram D, Rowe P. Compliance with statins in primary care. Pharm J 2004; 272: 23-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Vera, M. A., Bhole, V., Burns, L. C., & Lacaille, D.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
  • Arthritis Research Centre of Canada (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-19
Volume
78
Issue
4
Pages
684-698
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W1948458971
Cited by
289
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Arthritis Society
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 77605)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
statin adherence, medication adherence, statin discontinuation, cardiovascular disease, mortality, proportion of days covered, lipid-lowering therapy
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review