Cited by 36Pain Management and Placebo EffectStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

How do they add up? The interaction between the placebo and treatment effect: A systematic review

Open access
Boussageon, Rémy, Howick, Jeremy, Baron, Raphael, Naudet, Florian, Falissard, Bruno, Harika‐Germaneau, Ghina, Wassouf, Issa, Gueyffier, François +2 more·2022·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

AIM: The placebo effect and the specific effect are often thought to add up (additive model). Whether additivity holds can dramatically influence the external validity of a trial. This assumption of additivity was tested by Kleijnen et al in 1994 but the data produced since then have not been synthetized. In this review, we aimed to systematically review the literature to determine whether additivity held. METHODS: We searched Medline and PsychInfo up to 10 January 2019. Studies using the balanced placebo design (BPD), testing two different strengths of placebos, were included. The presence of interaction was evaluated by comparing each group in the BPD with analysis of variance or covariance. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included and the overall risk of bias was high: four found evidence of additivity and 16 studies found evidence of interaction (seven had evidence of positive additivity). CONCLUSION: Evidence of additivity between placebo and specific features of treatments was rare in included studies. We suggest interventions for placebo-sensitive ailments should be tested in trials designed to take interactions seriously once an exploratory RCTs has proven their efficacy with sufficient internal validity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bcp.15345

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings of balanced placebo designs that included other interventions and drug effects have been mixed regarding whether effects were additive or interactive.

    “Still, findings of balanced placebo designs that included other interventions and drug effects have been mixed regarding whether effects were additive or interactive (Boussageon et al., 2022; Metrik et al., 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [8]Puech J, Ortlieb JJ. Evaluation de la valeur thérapeutique d'un médicament. Méthode des placebos. Critique méthodologique. Presse Med. 1963; 71: 2168‐ 2170. 14094680
  2. [50]Wied GI. Über die Bedeutung der Suggestion in der Therapie klimakterischer Ausfallerscheinungen. Arztl Wochensch. 1953; 8(26): 623‐ 625. 13080040
  3. [72]Temkin O. The scientific approach to disease: specific entity and individual sickness. In: Crombie AC, ed. Scientific Change. Historical studies in the intellectual, social and technical conditions for scientific discovery and technical invention, from antiquity to the present. Glasgow: The University Press; 1963: 629‐ 647.
  4. [74]Gadow KD, White L, Fergusson DG. Placebo controls and double‐blind conditions: placebo theory in experimental design. In: Gadow KD, Poling A, eds. Methodological issues in human psychopharmacology. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, S1. London: Jai Press; 1986: 57.
  5. [76]Boussageon R. L'efficacité thérapeutique. Objectivité curative et effet placebo (Thesis), University of Lyon, France; 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boussageon, R., Howick, J., Baron, R., Naudet, F., Falissard, B., Harika‐Germaneau, G., Wassouf, I., Gueyffier, F., Jaafari, N., & Blanchard, C.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive (FR)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Université de Lyon (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit (FR)
  • Unité de recherche clinique intersectorielle en psychiatrie à vocation régionale Pierre Deniker du Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit France
  • Université de Poitiers (FR)
Corresponding author
Blanchard, Clara
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-05-02
Volume
88
Issue
8
Pages
3638-3656
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W4225318411
Cited by
36
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/V020706/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
placebo effect, additivity, generalizability
MeSH terms
Humans, Placebo Effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review