Cited by 35Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The effectiveness of third wave cognitive behavioural therapies for children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Open access
Perkins, Amorette M., Meiser‐Stedman, Richard, Spaul, Samuel W., Bowers, Gemma, Perkins, Abigail G., Pass, Laura·2023·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives: Third wave cognitive behavioural therapies are increasingly used with children and adolescents. This meta‐analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of four third‐wave interventions (acceptance and commitment therapy, compassion focused therapy, mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy, and metacognitive therapy) for youth. Methods: Four electronic databases were used to identify randomized controlled trials, which tested effects related to health, well‐being and functioning. Sensitivity analyses considering study quality were conducted and moderators were explored. Results: The results based on 50 RCTs meeting inclusion criteria indicated emotional symptoms/internalizing problems ( g = −.68, 95% CI −.98 to −.37, k = 43, N = 3265), behavioural difficulties/externalizing problems ( g = −.62, 95% CI −1.01 to −.22, k = 23, N = 1659), interference from difficulties ( g = −.46, 95% CI −.87 to −.05, k = 21, N = 1786), third wave processes ( g = .39, 95% CI .17 to .62, k = 22, N = 1900), wellbeing/flourishing ( g = .76, 95% CI .35 to 1.17, k = 21, N = 1303) and physical health/pain ( g = .72, 95% CI .01 to 1.44, k = 9, N = 1171) yielded significant effects. Effect for quality of life ( g = .62, 95% CI −.08 to 1.31, k = 12, N = 1271) was non‐significant. When analysing only those studies rated moderate‐high quality, third wave interventions yielded significant superiority effects compared to controls for emotional symptoms/internalizing problems ( g = −.55, 95% CI −.82 to −.27, k = 28, N = 2110), interference from difficulties ( g = −.48, 95% CI −.90 to −.05, k = 21, N = 1605), third wave processes ( g = .27, 95% CI .11 to .43, k = 18, N = 1692), well‐being/flourishing ( g = .50, 95% CI .18 to .81, k = 16, N = 1063), and quality of life ( g = .32, 95% CI .04 to .60, k = 10, N = 1212). Behavioural difficulties/externalizing problems ( g = −.38, 95% CI −.86 to .10, k = 15, N = 1351) and physical health/pain ( g = .52, 95% CI −.14 to 1.17, k = 8, N = 1139) ceased to be significant. Widespread heterogeneity raised concerns about generalizability and follow‐up data was relatively sparse. Conclusions: This meta‐analysis finds promising results for use of third wave CBT with youth, though the review has limitations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjc.12404

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behaviour change. Guilford Press.
  2. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive‐Behavioural treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2012). Methods for the development of NICE public health guidance (Third Edition). https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg4/resources/methods‐for‐the‐development‐of‐nice‐public‐health‐guidance‐third‐edition‐pdf‐2007967445701 27905711

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkins, A. M., Meiser‐Stedman, R., Spaul, S. W., Bowers, G., Perkins, A. G., & Pass, L.
Affiliations
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Meiser‐Stedman, Richard
  • Pass, Laura
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-28
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
209-227
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W4310191780
Cited by
35
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
children and adolescents, acceptance and commitment therapy, compassion-focused therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, metacognitive therapy, emotional symptoms, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, well-being, quality of life, physical health, treatment effectiveness, quality of evidence, treatment effect heterogeneity, treatment moderators
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Humans, Pain, Quality of Life, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Mindfulness, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review