Cited by 1,165Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression

Veeraraghavan, Vimala·2009·Anxiety, Stress & Coping

Abstract

Metacognitive therapy for anxiety and depression, by Adrian Wells, New York, The Guilford Press, 2008, +316 pp., £27.50 (hardcover), ISBN 978-1-59385-994-7 Therapies for mental disorders have been ...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10615800902833770

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veeraraghavan, V.
Corresponding author
Veeraraghavan, Vimala
Venue
Anxiety, Stress & Coping
Published
2009-10
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
587-589
ISSN
  • 1061-5806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-2205
OpenAlex
W2169065357
Cited by
1,165
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 50 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 111 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 29
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anxiety Stress & Coping (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
metacognitive therapy, anxiety, depression, cognitive therapy, metacognition, psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review