Cited by 17Dermatology and Skin DiseasesHealth Education and ValidationAsthma and respiratory diseases

Parental self-efficacy and the management of childhood atopic eczema: Development and testing of a new clinical outcome measure

Open access
Ersser, S.J., Farasat, H., Jackson, K., Gardiner, E., Sheppard, Z.A., Cowdell, F.·2015·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Effective parental management of childhood eczema requires education and support to reduce disease severity and improve the child's quality of life. Self-efficacy is a key factor influencing effective chronic disease management, yet there are no published scales to measure parental self-efficacy in managing childhood eczema. The Parental Self-Efficacy with Eczema Care Index (PASECI) was designed to measure parental self-efficacy in managing childhood eczema as a pre- and postintervention tool in the evaluation of a structured Eczema Education Programme (EEP). OBJECTIVES: To develop and test the validity, reliability and sensitivity of a new outcome measure (PASECI) designed to assess parental self-efficacy in managing their child's eczema to determine pre- vs. postintervention changes in educational intervention evaluation studies. METHODS: PASECI was developed from the literature, expert consultation and piloting of a 40-item prototype. The final 29-item scale is arranged in four subscales. Parents of children with eczema aged 0-16 years (n = 242) attending the EEP were assessed at 1 week pre-EEP and 4 weeks postintervention. Cronbach's α and factor analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: PASECI has face, content and construct validity. It is reliable, with high item internal consistency (α > 0·87 in all domains). Factor analysis revealed four viable domains. It was sensitive to change for postintervention measures using sign tests (P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: PASECI is a useful, valid, reliable and sensitive evaluative outcome measure of self-efficacy in parents managing childhood eczema.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjd.14175

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parents with high self-efficacy acquire great perceived confidence in managing their child's health conditions, resulting in better mental health outcomes and HRQoL.

    “It is well documented that parents who possess high levels of self-efficacy acquire great perceived confidence in managing their child’s health conditions, thereby resulting in better mental health outcomes and HRQoL [22,23].”

    From Roles of Parental Psychological Flexibility, Self-Compassion, and Self-Efficacy in Affecting Mental Health and Quality of Life in Parents of Children with Eczema (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) equates parental confidence in managing childhood eczema with self-efficacy and says effective parental management improves child and family quality of life. But the Results and Discussion (pages unavailable) say the relationship between measured parental self-efficacy and child quality of life was not established. The paper does not establish that high parental self-efficacy causes better mental health outcomes or HRQoL. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The roles of psychological flexibility and self-compassion remain unexplored in families with children diagnosed with eczema.

    “However, these roles remain unexplored in families with children diagnosed with eczema. The existing literature is predominantly focused on parental self-efficacy [23,48], leaving a critical gap in our understanding of the unique psychological aspects experienced by parents of children with eczema.”

    From Roles of Parental Psychological Flexibility, Self-Compassion, and Self-Efficacy in Affecting Mental Health and Quality of Life in Parents of Children with Eczema (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) and Discussion (page unavailable) show that this paper studies parental self-efficacy in childhood eczema. They do not establish that psychological flexibility or self-compassion remain unexplored in these families. The Introduction also says self-efficacy in dermatology had received little attention, rather than showing that the literature predominantly focused on it. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. McHenry PM, Williams HC, Bingham EA. Management of atopic eczema. British Medical Journal. 1995; 310:843-847.
  2. Buchholz, HT, Warschburger, P. von Schweri, AD. et al. Self-efficacy scale for parents of pre- schoolers with atopic dermatitis. Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Psychologie 2003; 12(2): 63-68.
  3. Schmitt, J. Spuls, PI, Thomas, KS. Et al The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) statement to assess clinical signs of atopic eczema in trials. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2014, 134:800-7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ersser, S. J., Farasat, H., Jackson, K., Gardiner, E., Sheppard, Z. A., & Cowdell, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Bournemouth University (GB)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Hull (GB)
Corresponding author
Ersser, S.J.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2015-11-08
Volume
173
Issue
6
Pages
1479-1485
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120598126
Cited by
17
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Guy's and St Thomas' Charity
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
parental self-efficacy, outcome measure development, parent education, eczema management, scale reliability and validity, chronic disease management
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Dermatitis, Atopic, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Parents, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review