Cited by 319Dermatology and Skin DiseasesDelphi Technique in ResearchContact Dermatitis and Allergies

The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) statement to assess clinical signs of atopic eczema in trials

Open access
Schmitt, Jochen, Spuls, Phyllis I., Thomas, Kim S., Simpson, Eric, Furue, Masutaka, Deckert, Stefanie, Dohil, Magdalene, Apfelbacher, Christian +3 more·2014·Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Abstract

The lack of core outcome sets for atopic eczema (AE) is a major obstacle for advancing evidence-based treatment. The global Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has already defined clinical signs, symptoms, quality of life, and long-term control of flares as core outcome domains for AE trials. This article deals with the standardization of measurement instruments to assess clinical signs of AE. To resolve the current lack of standardization of the assessment of clinical signs of AE, we followed a structured process of systematic reviews and international consensus sessions to identify 1 core outcome measurement instrument for assessment of clinical signs in all future AE trials. Systematic reviews indicated that from 16 different instruments identified to assess clinical signs of AE, only the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and the objective Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index were identified as extensively validated. The EASI has adequate validity, responsiveness, internal consistency, and intraobserver reliability. The objective SCORAD index has adequate validity, responsiveness, and interobserver reliability but unclear intraobserver reliability to measure clinical signs of AE. In an international consensus study, patients, physicians, nurses, methodologists, and pharmaceutical industry representatives agreed that the EASI is the preferred core instrument to measure clinical signs in all future AE trials. All stakeholders involved in designing, reporting, and using clinical trials on AE are asked to comply with this consensus to enable better evidence-based decision making, clearer scientific communication, and improved patient care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.043

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative has established a core outcome set of tools and end points to be used in clinical trials for atopic dermatitis.

    “The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has established a core outcome set of tools and end points to be used in clinical trials258–261 and are discussed in detail elsewhere37.”

    From Atopic dermatitis: an expanding therapeutic pipeline for a complex disease (2022) · cites this paper as [258]

    Step 2 identifies four core outcome domains for atopic eczema trials, and Step 3 reports that HOME selected EASI to measure clinical signs. But Step 3 says instruments for the other domains had not yet been agreed on, so the paper does not support the claim that a full set of tools had been established. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chalmers JR, Thomas KS, Nankervis H, Gerbens L, Spuls PI. Systematic review of what symptoms are measured in eczema treatment trials. Br J Dermatol 2014;170: e10-1.
  2. Leshem Y, Hajar T, Hanifin J, Simpson EL. Stratification of the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score using an anchor-based method: an interpretability study. Br J Dermatol 2014;170:e50.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmitt, J., Spuls, P. I., Thomas, K. S., Simpson, E., Furue, M., Deckert, S., Dohil, M., Apfelbacher, C., Singh, J. A., Chalmers, J., & Williams, H. C.
Affiliations
  • Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung (DE)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Schmitt, Jochen
Venue
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
134
Issue
4
Pages
800-807
ISSN
0091-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029005903
Cited by
319
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (RP-PG-0407-10177)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, core outcome set, Eczema Area and Severity Index, SCORAD, outcome measure standardization, measurement instrument validation, inter-rater reliability, intra-rater reliability
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Consensus Statements as Topic, Dermatitis, Atopic, Humans, International Cooperation, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review