Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 438

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and odds of S taphylococcus aureus carriage in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Totté, J.E.E., van der Feltz, W.T., Hennekam, M., van Belkum, A., van Zuuren, E.J., Pasmans, S.G.M.A.·2016·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is increasingly implicated as a possible causal factor in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD). However, the reported prevalence rates of skin and nasal colonization in the literature vary widely. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the prevalence and odds of skin and nasal colonization with S. aureus in patients with AD. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted. Odds ratios (ORs) for colonization in patients vs. controls and the prevalence of colonization in patients were pooled using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Overall, 95 observational studies were included, of which 30 had a control group. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality, with the majority of studies being of fair to poor quality. Patients with AD were more likely to be colonized with S. aureus than healthy controls [OR 19·74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 10·88-35·81]. Differences were smaller in nonlesional skin (OR 7·77, 95% CI 3·82-15·82) and in the nose (OR 4·50, 95% CI 3·00-6·75). The pooled prevalence of S. aureus colonization among patients was 70% for lesional skin, 39% for nonlesional skin and 62% for the nose. In lesional skin, meta-regression showed that the prevalence of colonization increased with disease severity. Study heterogeneity should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the importance of colonization with S. aureus in AD. Further evaluation of the mechanisms by which S. aureus influences inflammation is required in addition to the development of targeted strategies to decrease skin and nasal S. aureus load.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjd.14566

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Cited by

See all 438

Metadata

Authors
Totté, J. E. E., van der Feltz, W. T., Hennekam, M., van Belkum, A., van Zuuren, E. J., & Pasmans, S. G. M. A.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2016-07-05
Volume
175
Issue
4
Pages
687-695
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2298124544
Cited by
438
References
60
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and odds of S taphylococcus aureus carriage in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bjd.14566
The paper
Totté, J. E. E., van der Feltz, W. T., Hennekam, M., van Belkum, A., van Zuuren, E. J., & Pasmans, S. G. M. A. (2016). Prevalence and odds of S taphylococcus aureus carriage in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14566

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.