Accurate, inaccurate, or biased teacher expectations: Do D utch teachers differ in their expectations at the end of primary education?
Open accessAbstract
Background: In several tracked educational systems, realizing optimal placements in classes in the first year of secondary education depends on the accuracy of teacher expectations. Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate between‐teacher differences in their expectations regarding the academic aptitude of their students. Sample: The sample consisted of 500 teachers (classes) who provided their expectations of 7,550 students in the final grade of D utch primary education. Methods: We analysed the extent to which teachers differed in their expectations and in what contexts their expectations were biased, using multilevel random slope models. Results: Multilevel analysis showed teacher expectation bias to be related to gender and socio‐ethnic background of students. The differences among teachers in expectations for T urkish, Moroccan, and other foreign students with low‐educated parents were larger than the average teacher expectation bias for these groups in the sample. When student characteristics were controlled for, we found that the teachers in our sample had higher expectations for students in high‐performing classes or classes with only a small proportion of students from low‐ SES families. Teacher expectation bias for demographic groups, however, was found to be independent of the class population. Conclusions: The results indicate the importance of the teacher and the necessity of using multilevel models when investigating the complex nature of between‐teacher differences in expectations of student performance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biased teacher expectations seem to be the product of student characteristics, such as students' gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES).
“Biased teacher expectations seem to be the product of student characteristics, such as students ' gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) (e.g., De Boer et al., 2010; Timmermans et al., 2015).”
From The effects of teacher expectation interventions on teachers' expectations and student achievement: narrative review and meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Timmermans et al., 2015
Cites
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878 · see citing works
Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model.
Jussim, L. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.1.54 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy
Madon, S., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.791 · Cited by 304 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The closer to zero a student’s residual score is, the more accurate the expectation of the teacher was (Hinnant et al., 2009; Madon et al., 1997).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gentrup, S., Lorenz, G., Kristen, C., & Kogan, I. (2020) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101296 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
“First, Urhahne (2015) analyzed the effects of teacher expectations on students' motivations and emotions.”
BackgroundA systematic review of the teacher expectation literature over the past 30 years
Wang, S., Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Meissel, K. (2018) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2018.1548798 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
de Boer, H., Timmermans, A. C., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2018) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2018.1550834 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Timmermans, A. C., Kuyper, H., & van der Werf, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- GION Education/Research University of Groningen The Netherlands
- Corresponding author
- Timmermans, Anneke C.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-07-14
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 459-478
- ISSN
- 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8279
- OpenAlex
- W1564674661
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 38.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- British Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
- Keywords
- teacher expectations, academic aptitude, primary education, educational tracking, student gender, socioeconomic status
- MeSH terms
- School Teachers, Achievement, Adolescent, Child, Education, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Schools, Social Support, Students, Bias, Multilevel Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review