Cited by 304Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Choice and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup Psychology

In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy

Madon, Stephanie, Jussim, Lee, Eccles, Jacquelynne·1997·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

This research examined moderators of naturally occurring self-fulfilling prophecies. The authors assessed whether positive or negative self-fulfilling prophecies were more powerful and whether some targets were more susceptible to self-fulfilling prophecies because of their self-concepts in a particular achievement domain and previous academic records. Participants were 98 teachers and 1,539 students in sixth-grade public school math classes. Results yielded a strong pattern showing that teacher perceptions predicted achievement more strongly for low achievers than for high achievers. Results also yielded a much weaker pattern showing that teacher overestimates predicted achievement more strongly than teacher underestimates. Implications for social perceptual accuracy, self-enhancement theory, and understanding when self-fulfilling prophecies are stronger are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.791

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Residuals from regressions predicting teacher expectations from students' prior achievement, general cognitive abilities, and motivation reflect teacher expectation inaccuracy.

    “The residuals resulting from these regressions reflect the variance that remained unexplained and served as our measure of teacher expectation inaccuracy.”
  • Subjects respond more to positive than negative expectations.

    “they respond more to positive than negative expectations (Madon et al. 1997: 792)”

    From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Madon et al. 1997: 792

  • Even today, positive SFPs in individual, dyadic interactions are more likely and pronounced than negative ones.

    “Indeed, there is evidence that even today, positive SFPs in individual, dyadic interactions are more likely and pronounced than negative ones.”

    From What Is the Function of Confirmation Bias? (2022) · cites this paper as Madon et al. 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madon, S., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1997
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
791-809
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2101860102
Cited by
304
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29hd028401-05)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1 R29 HD28401-01A1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-fulfilling prophecy, teacher expectations, teacher perceptions, achievement, low achievers, high achievers, self-concept, self-enhancement theory, sixth grade students, mathematics achievement, academic records
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Problem Solving, Self Concept, Set, Psychology, Social Behavior, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review