Cited by 446Social Representations and IdentityCritical Realism in SociologyAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model.

Jussim, Lee·1991·Psychological Review

Abstract

This article presents a reflection-construction model of relations between social perception and social reality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.98.1.54

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jussim, L.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Jussim, Lee
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1991-01
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
54-73
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2072261931
Cited by
446
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
50.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
social perception, social reality, social cognition, social construction of reality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review