Cited by 46Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma after lenalidomide treatment failure

Open access
Siegel, David S., Schiller, Gary J., Song, Kevin W., Agajanian, Richy, Stockerl‐Goldstein, Keith, Kaya, Hakan, Sebag, Michael, Samaras, Christy +10 more·2020·British Journal of Haematology

Abstract

Summary: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) for whom the benefits of lenalidomide have been exhausted in early treatment lines need effective therapies. In cohort A of the phase 2 MM‐014 trial, we examined the safety and efficacy of pomalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone immediately after lenalidomide‐based treatment failure in patients with RRMM and two prior lines of therapy. Pomalidomide 4 mg was given on days 1 to 21 of 28‐day cycles. Dexamethasone 40 mg (20 mg for patients aged >75 years) was given on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 28‐day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The intention‐to‐treat population comprised 56 patients; all received prior lenalidomide (87·5% lenalidomide refractory) and 39 (69·6%) received prior bortezomib. ORR was 32·1% (28·2% in the prior‐bortezomib subgroup). Median PFS was 12·2 months (7·9 months in the prior‐bortezomib subgroup). Median OS was 41·7 months (38·6 months in the prior‐bortezomib subgroup). The most common grade 3/4 treatment‐emergent adverse events were anaemia (25·0%), pneumonia (14·3%) and fatigue (14·3%). These findings support earlier sequencing of pomalidomide‐based therapy in lenalidomide‐pretreated patients with RRMM, including those who have become refractory to lenalidomide. Trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01946477.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjh.16213

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro studies support the hypothesis that thalidomide analogues synergize with dexamethasone, proteasome inhibitors, histone deacetylase inhibitors and a variety of other agents.

    “Data from a number of in vitro studies support the hypothesis that thalidomide analogues synergize with dexamethasone49,50, proteasome inhibitors51,52, histone deacetylase inhibitors53,54 and a variety of other agents”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegel, D. S., Schiller, G. J., Song, K. W., Agajanian, R., Stockerl‐Goldstein, K., Kaya, H., Sebag, M., Samaras, C., Malek, E., Talamo, G., Seet, C. S., Mouro, J., Pierceall, W. E., Zafar, F., Chung, W., Srinivasan, S., Agarwal, A., & Bahlis, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Vancouver General Hospital (CA)
  • Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation (US)
  • Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO USA
  • Cancer Care Northwest (US)
  • McGill University Health Centre Montreal QC Canada
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
  • Penn State Cancer Institute (US)
  • Celgene (United States) (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Siegel, David S.
Venue
British Journal of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-06
Volume
188
Issue
4
Pages
501-510
ISSN
  • 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2141
OpenAlex
W2978510275
Cited by
46
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Haematology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Celgene
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, pomalidomide, low-dose dexamethasone, lenalidomide-refractory disease, treatment sequencing, overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-emergent adverse events
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Thalidomide, Survival Rate, Disease-Free Survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review