Cited by 47Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Abnormal development of the inferior temporal region in fetuses with Down syndrome

Open access
Guidi, Sandra, Giacomini, Andrea, Stagni, Fiorenza, Emili, Marco, Uguagliati, Beatrice, Bonasoni, Maria Paola, Bartesaghi, Renata·2018·Brain Pathology

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS) is a genetic condition associated with impairment in several cognitive domains. Previous evidence showed a notable neurogenesis reduction in the hippocampal region of DS fetuses, which may account for the impairment of declarative memory that characterizes DS starting from early life stages. The fusiform gyrus (FG) and the inferior temporal gyrus (ITG) play a key role in visual recognition memory, a function that is impaired in children and adults with DS. The goal of the current study was to establish whether fetuses with DS (17–21 weeks of gestation) exhibit neuroanatomical alterations in the FG and ITG that may underlie recognition memory impairment. We found that the FG and ITG of fetuses with DS had a reduced thickness and fewer cells in comparison with euploid fetuses. Moreover, DS fetuses had fewer cells expressing the neuronal marker NeuN than euploid fetuses, but a similar number of cells expressing the astrocytic marker GFAP and, consequently, a higher percentage of astrocytes. Immunohistochemistry for calretinin (CR), a marker of GABAergic interneurons, showed that in DS fetuses the ratio of CR‐positive vs. CR‐negative cells was greater than in euploid fetuses, both in the FG (177%) and ITG (161%). An increased ratio of CR‐positive vs. CR‐negative cells was also found in the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus and dentate gyrus. Results provide novel evidence that the FG and ITG of DS fetuses exhibit numerous developmental defects. These defects may underlie the functional alterations in visual recognition memory observed in children with DS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bpa.12605

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have shown that fewer interneurons are present in the cortex of individuals with Down syndrome than in controls, suggesting that reduced generation of interneurons contributes to the overall reduced neurogenesis in Down syndrome.

    “Several studies have shown that fewer interneurons are present in the cortex of individuals with DS44,46,84 than in that of controls, suggesting that reduced generation of interneurons contributes to the overall reduced neurogenesis in DS.”

    From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 2 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An increased number of astrocytes has been observed in the frontal lobe, fusiform gyrus, and inferior temporal gyrus of developing fetuses with Down syndrome compared to those without (17-21 weeks).

    “An increased number of astrocytes has been observed in the frontal lobe (Zdaniuk et al., 2011), fusiform gyrus, and inferior temporal gyrus (Guidi et al., 2018) of developing fetuses with DS compared to those without (17–21 weeks).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Guidi et al., 2018

    The Results section, “Density and percentage of neurons and astrocytes in the FG and ITG of fetuses with DS,” reports a similar absolute number of cells with an astrocytic phenotype in DS and euploid fetuses, not an increased number. It reports a higher percentage of astrocytes in both gyri. The frontal-lobe finding is attributed to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The presence of fewer cycling cells and the reduced number of progenitors both support the suggestion that neurogenesis is reduced during development in Down syndrome, although these data do not distinguish between slower progenitor proliferation or premature progenitor cell cycle exit.

    “Together, the presence of fewer cycling cells and the reduced number of progenitors both support the suggestion that neurogenesis is reduced during development in DS, although these data do not distinguish between slower progenitor proliferation or premature progenitor cell cycle exit.”

    From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Analyses of fetal brain tissue indicate that there are fewer proliferating cells, as measured by expression of the cell cycle marker Ki67 and of cyclin proteins, in the germinal zones of the hippocampus and cortex in Down syndrome.

    “Analyses of fetal brain tissue indicate that there are fewer proliferating cells, as measured by their expression of the cell cycle marker Ki67 and of cyclin proteins, in the germinal zones of the hippocampus and cortex in DS40,42–44,47,50,64.”

    From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    The section “Abnormal architecture and reduced neuron number in the FG and ITG of DS fetuses” reports a previously observed reduction in proliferating neural precursors in the germinal matrix of DS fetuses. The Abstract also notes reduced neurogenesis in the hippocampal region. Neither passage says that proliferation in both hippocampal and cortical germinal zones was measured using Ki67 and cyclin proteins. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increased numbers of astrocytes have been reported in the fetal brain in individuals with Down syndrome.

    “Increased numbers of astrocytes have been reported in the fetal brain in individuals with DS42,44,99 (Fig. 1).”

    From Consequences of trisomy 21 for brain development in Down syndrome (2024) · cites this paper as [44]

    In “Abnormal architecture and reduced neuron number in the FG and ITG of DS fetuses” (page not provided), the paper reports a relative increase in GFAP-positive astrocytes in the fetal hippocampus. But its own FG and ITG results found similar absolute numbers of GFAP-positive cells in DS and euploid fetuses; the increased S100B-positive cells cannot all be identified as astrocytes because S100B also marks other glia. The claim therefore overstates the evidence for increased astrocyte numbers in the fetal brain. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]2. Barinka F, Druga R (2010) Calretinin expression in the mammalian neocortex: a review. Physiol Res 59 :665-677.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guidi, S., Giacomini, A., Stagni, F., Emili, M., Uguagliati, B., Bonasoni, M. P., & Bartesaghi, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia (IT)
Venue
Brain Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-07-05
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
986-998
ISSN
  • 1015-6305 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3639
OpenAlex
W2791044485
Cited by
47
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fondazione del Monte, Bologna, Italy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Down syndrome, fetal brain development, inferior temporal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, visual recognition memory, calretinin, GABAergic interneurons, astrocytes, NeuN, glial fibrillary acidic protein, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, neuroanatomical changes
MeSH terms
Astrocytes, Cell Count, Cerebral Cortex, Down Syndrome, Female, Fetus, Hippocampus, Humans, Interneurons, Male, Temporal Lobe, Recognition, Psychology, Fetal Development, Neurogenesis, GABAergic Neurons, Calbindin 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review