Cited by 188Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Early pharmacotherapy restores neurogenesis and cognitive performance in the Ts65Dn mouse model for down syndrome

Open access
Bianchi, P., Ciani, E., Guidi, S., Trazzi, S., Felice, D., Grossi, G., Fernandez, M., Giuliani, A. +2 more·2010·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS) is a genetic pathology characterized by intellectual disability and brain hypotrophy. Widespread neurogenesis impairment characterizes the fetal and neonatal DS brain, strongly suggesting that this defect may be a major determinant of mental retardation. Our goal was to establish, in a mouse model for DS, whether early pharmacotherapy improves neurogenesis and cognitive behavior. Neonate Ts65Dn mice were treated from postnatal day (P) 3 to P15 with fluoxetine, an antidepressant that inhibits serotonin (5-HT) reuptake and increases proliferation in the adult Ts65Dn mouse (Clark et al., 2006). On P15, they received a BrdU injection and were killed after either 2 h or 1 month. Results showed that P15 Ts65Dn mice had notably defective proliferation in the hippocampal dentate gyrus, subventricular zone, striatum, and neocortex and that proliferation was completely rescued by fluoxetine. In the hippocampus of untreated P15 Ts65Dn mice, we found normal 5-HT levels but a lower expression of 5-HT1A receptors and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). In Ts65Dn mice, fluoxetine treatment restored the expression of 5-HT1A receptors and BDNF. One month after cessation of treatment, there were more surviving cells in the dentate gyrus of Ts65Dn mice, more cells with a neuronal phenotype, more proliferating precursors, and more granule cells. These animals were tested for contextual fear conditioning, a hippocampus-dependent memory task, and exhibited a complete recovery of memory performance. Results show that early pharmacotherapy with a drug usable by humans can correct neurogenesis and behavioral impairment in a model for DS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.0534-10.2010

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ts65Dn mice exhibit deficient neurological structural phenotypes in brain regions where the current study found DYRK1A overexpression, including during perinatal or early postnatal ages.

    “Ts65Dn mice do exhibit deficient neurological structural phenotypes in brain regions where we found DYRK1A overexpression including during perinatal or early postnatal ages (Baxter et al., 2000; Belichenko et al., 2004; Bianchi et al., 2010; Chakrabarti et al., 2007; Roper et al., 2006b; Stagni et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bianchi, P., Ciani, E., Guidi, S., Trazzi, S., Felice, D., Grossi, G., Fernandez, M., Giuliani, A., Calza, L., & Bartesaghi, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
Corresponding author
Bartesaghi, R.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-06-30
Volume
30
Issue
26
Pages
8769-8779
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2086398583
Cited by
188
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 25
FWCI
17.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Down syndrome, Ts65Dn mouse model, fluoxetine, neurogenesis, serotonin, 5-HT1A receptor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, dentate gyrus, subventricular zone, striatum, neocortex, cell proliferation, contextual fear conditioning, hippocampal-dependent memory, intellectual disability
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Brain, Cognition, Disease Models, Animal, Down Syndrome, Fluoxetine, Memory Disorders, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Serotonin, Stem Cells, Time Factors, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Receptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1A, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Neurogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review