Cited by 120Pain Management and Opioid UseOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Analgesic efficacy of opioids in chronic pain: recent meta‐analyses

Open access
Reinecke, H, Weber, C, Lange, K, Simon, M, Stein, C, Sorgatz, H·2015·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Opioids are regularly administered in acute and cancer pain. In chronic non‐cancer pain (CNCP), however, their use is controversial. Previous meta‐analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) lack methodological homogeneity and comparable data. Here we analysed the maximum analgesic efficacies of opioids and non‐opioids compared with placebo, and of physiotherapy and psychotherapy compared with active or waiting‐list controls. We screened 3647 citations and included RCTs if treatment duration was at least 3 weeks, data were sufficient for meta‐analysis, and criteria for high quality were met. Only 46 studies (10 742 patients) met the criteria. Weighted and standardized mean differences (WMD, SMD) between pain intensities were pooled to conduct separate meta‐analyses for each treatment category. At the end of treatment the WMD for pain reduction (100‐point scale) was 12.0 for ‘strong’ opioids, 10.6 for ‘weak’ opioids, 8.4 for non‐opioids (each vs. placebo), 5.5 for psychotherapy and 4.5 for physiotherapy (each vs. active controls). Dropout rates were high in pharmacological studies. The 95% confidence intervals using the outcomes of control groups did not indicate statistical differences between efficacies of the five interventions. Because not enough eligible head‐to‐head trials were available, our analysis is limited to adjusted indirect comparisons. The heterogeneity of pre‐post pain differences in control groups did not allow the definition of a common comparator. In conclusion, although there were statistically significant differences between maximum treatment efficacies, no intervention per se produced clinically important improvements in average pain intensity. Thus, opioids alone are inappropriate and multimodal treatment programmes may be required for CNCP. Linked Articles: This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bph.12634

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reinecke, H., Weber, C., Lange, K., Simon, M., Stein, C., & Sorgatz, H.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
Corresponding author
Stein, C
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07
Volume
172
Issue
2
Pages
324-333
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2135855727
Cited by
120
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Bundesministerium fuer Bildung und Forschung
  • Deutsche Gesellschaft zum Studium des Schmerzes
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
opioids, chronic non-cancer pain, analgesic efficacy, strong opioids, weak opioids, non-opioid analgesics, physiotherapy, psychotherapy, multimodal pain management, pain intensity, placebo comparison, indirect comparison
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Humans, Quality of Life, Selection Bias, Treatment Outcome, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review