The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The macrolide antibiotic renaissance
Open accessAbstract
Macrolides represent a large family of protein synthesis inhibitors of great clinical interest due to their applicability to human medicine. Macrolides are composed of a macrocyclic lactone of different ring sizes, to which one or more deoxy‐sugar or amino sugar residues are attached. Macrolides act as antibiotics by binding to bacterial 50S ribosomal subunit and interfering with protein synthesis. The high affinity of macrolides for bacterial ribosomes, together with the highly conserved structure of ribosomes across virtually all of the bacterial species, is consistent with their broad‐spectrum activity. Since the discovery of the progenitor macrolide, erythromycin, in 1950, many derivatives have been synthesised, leading to compounds with better bioavailability and acid stability and improved pharmacokinetics. These efforts led to the second generation of macrolides, including well‐known members such as azithromycin and clarithromycin. Subsequently, in order to address increasing antibiotic resistance, a third generation of macrolides displaying improved activity against many macrolide resistant strains was developed. However, these improvements were accompanied with serious side effects, leading to disappointment and causing many researchers to stop working on macrolide derivatives, assuming that this procedure had reached the end. In contrast, a recent published breakthrough introduced a new chemical platform for synthesis and discovery of a wide range of diverse macrolide antibiotics. This chemical synthesis revolution, in combination with reduction in the side effects, namely, ‘Ketek effects’, has led to a macrolide renaissance, increasing the hope for novel and safe therapeutic agents to combat serious human infectious diseases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Macrolides, such as erythromycin, azithromycin, and clarithromycin, inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit and preventing peptide elongation [260,261].”
From Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [260]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling
Ingolia, N. T., Ghaemmaghami, S., Newman, J. R. S., & Weissman, J. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168978 · Cited by 3,853
Pao, S. S., Paulsen, I. T., & Saier, M. H. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.1.1-34.1998 · Cited by 2,297
Ribosome-targeting antibiotics and mechanisms of bacterial resistance
Wilson, D. N. (2014) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3155 · Cited by 1,054
Molecular Mechanism of Drug-Dependent Ribosome Stalling
Vazquez-Laslop, N., Thum, C., & Mankin, A. S. (2008) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.026 · Cited by 260
Translation and Protein Synthesis: Macrolides
Katz, L., & Ashley, G. W. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030107f · Cited by 177
Mechanism of Tet(O)‐mediated tetracycline resistance
Connell, S. R., Trieber, C. A., Dinos, G. P., Einfeldt, E., Taylor, D. E., & Nierhaus, K. H. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg093 · Cited by 127
Self-citationSequence selectivity of macrolide-induced translational attenuation
Davis, A. R., Gohara, D. W., & Yap, M.-N. F. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1410356111 · Cited by 123
Erythromycin inhibits the assembly of the large ribosomal subunit in growing Escherichia coli cells
Chittum, H. S., & Champney, W. S. (1995) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf00295501 · Cited by 88
Cited by
Du, L., Ahmad, S., Liu, L., Wang, L., & Tang, J. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159815 · Cited by 298
Staphylococcus aureus: A Review of the Pathogenesis and Virulence Mechanisms
Touaitia, R., Mairi, A., Ibrahim, N. A., Basher, N. S., Idres, T., & Touati, A. (2025) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics14050470 · Cited by 273
Mahmud, Z., Manik, M. R. K., Rahman, A., Karim, M. M., & Islam, L. N. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71472-6 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Dinos, G. P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-08-10
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2967-2983
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W2733572144
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 15.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The macrolide antibiotic renaissance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/bph.13936
- The paper
- Dinos, G. P. (2017). The macrolide antibiotic renaissance. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13936
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.