Cited by 95Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy for depression in adolescents

Open access
Ames, Catherine S., Richardson, Jessica, Payne, Susanna, Smith, Patrick, Leigh, Eleanor·2014·Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy ( MBCT ) has been shown to be effective in preventing relapse of depression in adults, but has not previously been applied to adolescents who have residual symptoms of depression following treatment. Method: An 8‐week MBCT group was adapted for adolescents, and evaluated using qualitative and quantitative measures. Results: Participants report high levels of satisfaction with the group intervention. Qualitative analysis of semi‐structured interviews provides areas for future development of this intervention. Pilot data indicate reductions in depressive symptoms, alongside positive change in mindfulness skills, quality of life and rumination. Conclusions: Preliminary evidence for the use of MBCT with this group of adolescents is provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/camh.12034

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Angold, A., Costello, E.J., Messer, S.C., Pickles, A., Winder, F., & Silver, D. (1995). The development of a short questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents. International Journal of Methods in Psychiat- ric Research, 5, 237-249.
  2. Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T., & Rennie, D.L. (1999). Evolving guide- lines for publication of qualitative research studies in psy- chology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.
  3. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties question- naire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psy- chiatry, 38, 581-586.
  4. Greco, L.A., Dew, S.E., & Ball, S. (2005). Acceptance, mindful- ness, and related processes in childhood: Measurement issues, clinical relevance, and future directions. In S.E. Dew & R. Baer (Chairs), Measuring acceptance, mindfulness, and related processes: Empirical findings and clinical applica- tions across child, adolescent, and adult samples. Washing- ton, DC: Symposium presented at the Association for Behavior and Cognitive Therapies.
  5. Greco, L.A., & Hayes, S.C. (2008). Acceptance and mindfulness interventions for children, adolescents, and families. Oak- land, CA: Context Press/New Harbinger Publications.
  6. Segal, Z.V., Williams, J.M.G., & Teasdale, J.D. (2002). Mindful- ness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press.
  7. Semple, R.J., & Lee, J. (2008). Treating anxiety with mindful- ness: Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for children. In L.A. Greco & S.C. Hayes (Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulness interventions for children, adolescents, and families (pp. 94- 134). Oakland, CA: Context Press/New Harbinger Publica- tions.
  8. Semple, R.J., Lee, J., Rosa, D., & Miller, L.F. (2009). A random- ized trial of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for children: Promoting mindful attention to enhance social-emotional resiliency in children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, doi:10.1007/s10826-10009-19301-y. · DOI
  9. Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretive phenomenologi- cal analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A practical guide for research methods (pp. 51-80). London: Sage.
  10. Williams, J., Teasdale, J., Segal, Z., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (2007). The mindful way through depression, freeing yourself from chronic unhappiness. New York: Guildford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ames, C. S., Richardson, J., Payne, S., Smith, P., & Leigh, E.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Ames, Catherine S.
Venue
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-28
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
74-78
ISSN
  • 1475-357X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3588
OpenAlex
W2153119361
Cited by
95
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, adolescent depression, relapse prevention, residual depressive symptoms, group intervention, mindfulness skills, rumination, quality of life, treatment satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review