The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The link between infection and cancer: Tumor vasculature, free radicals, and drug delivery to tumors via the EPR effect
Open accessAbstract
This review focuses primarily on my own research, including pathogenic mechanisms of microbial infection, vascular permeability in infection and tumors, and effects of nitric oxide (NO), superoxide anion radical (), and 8‐nitroguanosine in the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for the tumor‐selective delivery of macromolecular agents (nanomedicines). Infection‐induced vascular permeability is mediated by activation of the kinin‐generating protease cascade (kallikrein–kinin) triggered by exogenous microbial proteases. A similar mechanism operates in cancer tissues and in carcinomatosis of the pleural and peritoneal cavities. Infection also stimulates generation via activation of xanthine oxidase while generating NO by inducing NO synthase. These chemicals function in mutation and carcinogenesis and promote inflammation, in which peroxynitrite (a product of and NO) activates MMP, damages DNA and RNA, and regenerates 8‐nitroguanosine and 8‐oxoguanosine. We showed vascular permeability by using macromolecular drugs, which are not simply extravasated through the vascular wall into the tumor interstitium but remain there for prolonged periods. We thus discovered the EPR effect, which led to the rational development of tumor‐selective delivery of polymer conjugates, micellar and liposomal drugs, and genes. Our styrene–maleic acid copolymer conjugated with neocarzinostatin was the first agent of its kind used to treat hepatoma. The EPR effect occurs not only because of defective vascular architecture but also through the generation of various vascular mediators such as kinin, NO, and vascular endothelial growth factor. Although most solid tumors, including human tumors, show the EPR effect, heterogeneity of tumor tissue may impede drug delivery. This review describes the barriers and countermeasures for improved drug delivery to tumors by using nanomedicines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cancer chemoprevention with dietary phytochemicals
Surh, Y.-J. (2003) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1189 · Cited by 2,955
Maeda, H. (2001) · Advances in Enzyme Regulation · doi:10.1016/s0065-2571(00)00013-3 · Cited by 2,495
Self-citationMaeda, H., Nakamura, H., & Fang, J. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.10.002 · Cited by 2,376
Self-citation
Cited by
Ulbrich, K., Holá, K., Šubr, V., Bakandritsos, A., Tuček, J., & Zbořil, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00589 · Cited by 1,730
Maeda, H. (2015) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.01.002 · Cited by 1,179
Self-citationWu, J. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11080771 · Cited by 1,030
Kobayashi, H., Watanabe, R., & Choyke, P. L. (2014) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.7193 · Cited by 996
Fang, J., Islam, W., & Maeda, H. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.005 · Cited by 757
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Maeda, H.
- Venue
- Cancer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-22
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 779-789
- ISSN
- 1347-9032 (ISSN-L)
- 1349-7006
- OpenAlex
- W2013119249
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The link between infection and cancer: Tumor vasculature, free radicals, and drug delivery to tumors via the EPR effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/cas.12152
- The paper
- Maeda, H. (2013). The link between infection and cancer: Tumor vasculature, free radicals, and drug delivery to tumors via the EPR effect. Cancer Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.