Cited by 1,030Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsBarrier Structure and Function Studies

The Enhanced Permeability and Retention (EPR) Effect: The Significance of the Concept and Methods to Enhance Its Application

Open access
Wu, Jun·2021·Journal of Personalized Medicine

Abstract

Chemotherapy for human solid tumors in clinical practice is far from satisfactory. Despite the discovery and synthesis of hundreds of thousands of anticancer compounds targeting various crucial units in cancer cell proliferation and metabolism, the fundamental problem is the lack of targeting delivery of these compounds selectively into solid tumor tissue to maintain an effective concentration level for a certain length of time for drug-tumor interaction to execute anticancer activities. The enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR effect) describes a universal pathophysiological phenomenon and mechanism in which macromolecular compounds such as albumin and other polymer-conjugated drugs beyond certain sizes (above 40 kDa) can progressively accumulate in the tumor vascularized area and thus achieve targeting delivery and retention of anticancer compounds into solid tumor tissue. Targeting therapy via the EPR effect in clinical practice is not always successful since the strength of the EPR effect varies depending on the type and location of tumors, status of blood perfusion in tumors, and the physical-chemical properties of macromolecular anticancer agents. This review highlights the significance of the concept and mechanism of the EPR effect and discusses methods for better utilizing the EPR effect in developing smarter macromolecular nanomedicine to achieve a satisfactory outcome in clinical applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jpm11080771

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many clinical cancers such as late-stage and refractory tumors are associated with poor blood flow due to coagulation and thrombi formation, exhibiting poor EPR effect.

    “However, many clinical cancers such as late-stage tumors and refractory tumors are associated with poor blood flow due to the coagulation and thrombi formation exhibiting poor EPR effect [7,8,9,10,11,12].”

    From Approaches to Improve EPR-Based Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    Section 3 says abnormal tumor vessels obstruct blood flow, and Section 4.2 says blood flow is critical to nanomedicine delivery via the EPR effect (page numbers unavailable). The cited paper does not establish that coagulation or thrombi cause poor flow in late-stage or refractory tumors, or specifically link those tumor types to poor EPR. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The EPR effect can be enhanced by modifying vascular intermediaries such as angiotensin II, nitroglycerin or NO, CO, and enzyme inhibitors.

    “The EPR effect can be enhanced by modifying vascular intermediaries such as angiotensin II, nitroglycerin or NO, CO, and enzyme inhibitors [7,8,9,10].”

    From Approaches to Improve EPR-Based Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

    Section 4.1 says nitric oxide donors can enhance the EPR effect, and its cited references discuss nitroglycerin. Section 4.2 says angiotensin II increases tumor blood flow and drug delivery, but does not explicitly say it enhances the EPR effect. The passages do not establish CO or enzyme inhibitors as EPR-enhancing interventions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, J.
Affiliations
Beckman Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Jun
ORCID
Wu, Jun
Venue
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-08-06
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
771
ISSN
2075-4426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3191894985
Cited by
1,030
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 230 · 2025: 318 · 2024: 224 · 2023: 165 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 7
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
enhanced permeability and retention effect, macromolecular drug delivery, albumin, solid tumors, tumor vascularization, nanomedicine, tumor perfusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review