Cited by 18Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Not just g RAS ping at flaws: Finding vulnerabilities to develop novel therapies for treating KRAS mutant cancers

Open access

Abstract

Mutations in K irsten rat‐sarcoma ( KRAS ) are well appreciated to be major drivers of human cancers through dysregulation of multiple growth and survival pathways. Similar to many other non‐kinase oncogenes and tumor suppressors, efforts to directly target KRAS pharmaceutically have not yet materialized. As a result, there is broad interest in an alternative approach to develop therapies that induce synthetic lethality in cancers with mutant KRAS , therefore exposing the particular vulnerabilities of these cancers. Fueling these efforts is our increased understanding into the biology driving KRAS mutant cancers, in particular the important pathways that mutant KRAS governs to promote survival. In this mini‐review, we summarize the latest approaches to treat KRAS mutant cancers and the rationale behind them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cas.12383

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dual MEK/AKT inhibition has failed clinically owing to toxicities caused by direct pathway inhibition in patients.

    “dual MEK/AKT inhibition, while promising in model systems, has failed clinically owing to toxicities caused by direct pathway inhibition in patients (Ebi et al., 2014).”

    From A Landscape of Therapeutic Cooperativity in KRAS Mutant Cancers Reveals Principles for Controlling Tumor Evolution (2017) · cites this paper as Ebi et al., 2014

    In “Targeting PI3K-AKT and MEK-ERK Signaling by Combinatorial Approaches” (page not provided), the review reports promising results in models and says clinical activity appears limited because sufficiently suppressing both pathways without toxicity is difficult. But it also reports partial responses and ongoing trials, so saying dual inhibition has categorically “failed clinically” overstates the source. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Therapies targeting MEK alongside the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway have been limited by toxicities, making it difficult to achieve complete pathway inhibition in patients.

    “Therapies targeting MEK alongside the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway have been limited by toxicities, making it difficult to achieve complete pathway inhibition in patients”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1038/nrc3106 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nature12912 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/nature12634 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nature12796 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nature12205 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2008.05.001 · DOI
  7. 10.1128/MCB.16.7.3923 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.0907325106 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401054 · DOI
  10. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e8b3a3 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s10637-010-9392-8 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s10637-011-9687-4 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.051 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.09.012 · DOI
  15. 10.1172/JCI57909 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0520 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/nm.1890 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1042/BJ20080639 · DOI
  19. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6656 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1947601911407329 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/nrc2296 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/sj.embor.embor899 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.04.030 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1074/jbc.270.38.22473 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/ncb728 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.06.020 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.034 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.0905056106 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1314124110 · DOI
  31. 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-147 · DOI
  32. BedardP TaberneroJ KurzrockRet al.A phase lb open‐label multicenter dose‐escalation study of the oral pan‐PI3K inhibitor BKM120 in combination with the oral MEK1/2 inhibitor GSK1120212 in patients (pts) with selected advanced solid tumors.ASCO Meeting Abstracts2012; Abst 3003. · DOI
  33. SperanzaG KindersRJ KhinSet al.Pharmacodynamic biomarker‐driven trial of MK‐2206 an AKT inhibitor with AZD6244 (selumetinib) a MEK inhibitor in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC).ASCO Meeting Abstracts2012; Abst 3529. · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040294 · DOI
  35. 10.1126/scisignal.2003483 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nature08460 · DOI
  37. 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4956 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.10 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0949 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/bjc.2012.8 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70489-8 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.04.026 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.041 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.059 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/cr.2012.82 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.017 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.033 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1073/pnas.1105941108 · DOI
  51. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0778 · DOI
  52. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0336 · DOI
  53. 10.1172/JCI37127 · DOI
  54. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0615 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)61562-5 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/onc.2010.298 · DOI
  57. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1750 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ebi, H., Faber, A. C., Engelman, J. A., & Yano, S.
Affiliations
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ebi, Hiromichi
Venue
Cancer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-03-26
Volume
105
Issue
5
Pages
499-505
ISSN
  • 1347-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1349-7006
OpenAlex
W2057330346
Cited by
18
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Kanazawa University Repository for Academic Resources (DSpace) (Kanazawa University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26830105)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
KRAS mutation, KRAS-mutant cancer, synthetic lethality, cancer vulnerability, cancer therapy
MeSH terms
Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Apoptosis, Receptor, IGF Type 1, ras Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review