Cited by 27Child Development and Digital TechnologySocial Robot Interaction and HRIChild and Animal Learning Development

Talking with machines: Can conversational technologies serve as children's social partners?

Open access
Xu, Ying·2023·Child Development Perspectives

Abstract

Back-and-forth conversations with others are vital for children's development in the early years. While children's conversation partners have traditionally been their parents, teachers, and peers, recent advances in artificial intelligence have led to the introduction of machines that understand human speech and generate natural responses, and thus can engage children in conversations. As these technologies become increasingly ubiquitous in children's lives, questions arise as to how they might affect children's development: How do children interact with, perceive, and learn from conversational technologies? Can these technologies serve as children's social partners? In this article, I detail what we know about these topics and discuss the possible implications of conversational technologies for children's shifting media landscape. I also suggest research agendas that can unpack the complex interplay among children, their social contexts, and conversational technology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdep.12475

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Xu [58] suggests that children engage in more complex conversations with humans, particularly because humans can use nonverbal cues such as nodding and eye contact, which AI currently lacks.

    “Similarly, Xu [58], in her article in Child Development Perspectives, suggests that children engage in more complex conversations with humans, particularly because humans can use nonverbal cues (e.g., nodding, eye contact), which AI currently lacks.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people. Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Y.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Xu, Ying
Venue
Child Development Perspectives
Published
2023-02-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
53-58
ISSN
  • 1750-8592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-8606
OpenAlex
W4313297029
Cited by
27
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2115382)
  • National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka (2115382)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
conversational technologies, human-machine interaction, chatbots, child development, early childhood, social interaction, artificial intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review