Cited by 113Language Development and DisordersSocial Robot Interaction and HRIReading and Literacy Development

Dialogue with a conversational agent promotes children’s story comprehension via enhancing engagement

Open access
Xu, Ying, Aubele, Joseph, Vigil, Valery, Bustamante, Andres S, Kim, Young-Suk, Warschauer, Mark·2022·Child Development

Abstract

Dialogic reading, when children are read a storybook and engaged in relevant conversation, is a powerful strategy for fostering language development. With the development of artificial intelligence, conversational agents can engage children in elements of dialogic reading. This study examined whether a conversational agent can improve children's story comprehension and engagement, as compared to an adult reading partner. Using a 2 (dialogic reading or non-dialogic reading) × 2 (agent or human) factorial design, a total of 117 three- to six-year-olds (50% Female, 37% White, 31% Asian, 21% multi-ethnic) were randomly assigned into one of the four conditions. Results revealed that a conversational agent can replicate the benefits of dialogic reading with a human partner by enhancing children's narrative-relevant vocalizations, reducing irrelevant vocalizations, and improving story comprehension.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.13708

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. NAEYC research into practice series (Vol. 7). National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  2. Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language. MIT Press.
  3. Zevenbergen, A. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2003). Dialogic reading: A shared picture book reading intervention for preschoolers. In A. van Kleeck, S. A. Stahl, & E. B. Bauer (Eds.), Center for Improvement of Early Reading Achievement, CIERA. On reading books to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 177– 200). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, Y., Aubele, J., Vigil, V., Bustamante, A. S., Kim, Y.-S., & Warschauer, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Xu, Ying
Venue
Child Development
Published
2022-03-01
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
e149-e167
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W3214237218
Cited by
113
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 1
FWCI
17.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1906321)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
dialogic reading, chatbots, narrative comprehension, child engagement, language development, early childhood, artificial intelligence in education
MeSH terms
Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Language Development, Male, Reading, Comprehension, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review