Cited by 131Urticaria and Related ConditionsMast cells and histamineEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes

H1‐antihistamine‐refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria: it's worse than we thought – first results of the multicenter real‐life AWARE study

Maurer, M., Staubach, P., Raap, U., Richter‐Huhn, G., Bauer, A., Ruëff, F., Jakob, T., Yazdi, A. S. +9 more·2017·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: Background: Most data on chronic spontaneous urticaria ( CSU ) originate from highly selected patient populations treated at specialized centres. Little is known about CSU patient characteristics and the burden of CSU in routine clinical practice. AWARE (A World‐wide Antihistamine‐Refractory chronic urticaria patient Evaluation) is an ongoing global study designed to assess chronic urticaria in the real‐life setting. Objective: To describe the baseline characteristics of the first 1539 German AWARE patients with H1‐antihistamine‐refractory CSU . Methods: This prospective non‐interventional study included patients (18–75 years) with a diagnosis of H1‐antihistamine‐refractory CSU for > 2 months. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics, comorbidities, and pharmacological treatments were recorded. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the dermatology life quality index ( DLQI ), chronic urticaria QoL questionnaire ( CU ‐Q 2 oL), and angioedema QoL questionnaire ( AE ‐QoL, in cases of angioedema). Previous healthcare resource utilization and sick leave data were collected retrospectively. Results: Between March and December 2014, 1539 patients were assessed in 256 sites across Germany. The percentage of females, mean age, and mean body mass index were 70%, 46.3 years, and 27 kg/m 2 , respectively. The mean urticaria control test score was 7.9, one in two patients had angioedema, and the most frequent comorbidities were chronic inducible urticaria ( CI ndU; 24%), allergic rhinitis (18.2%), hypertension (18.1%), asthma (12%), and depression (9.5%). Overall, 57.6% of patients were receiving at least one pharmacological treatment including second‐generation H1‐antihistamines (46.3%), first‐generation H1‐antihistamines (9.1%), and corticosteroids (15.8%). The mean DLQI , total CU ‐Q 2 oL, and total AE ‐QoL scores were 8.3, 36.2, and 46.8, respectively. CSU patients reported frequent use of healthcare resources, including emergency services (29.7%), general practitioners (71.9%), and additional allergists or dermatologists (50.7%). Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: This study reveals that German H1‐antihistamine‐refractory CSU patients have high rates of uncontrolled disease, angioedema, and comorbid CI ndU, are undertreated, have impaired QoL, and rely heavily on healthcare resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cea.12900

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maurer, M., Staubach, P., Raap, U., Richter‐Huhn, G., Bauer, A., Ruëff, F., Jakob, T., Yazdi, A. S., Mahler, V., Wagner, N., Lippert, U., Hillen, U., Schwinn, A., Pawlak, M., Behnke, N., Chaouche, K., & Chapman‐Rothe, N.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
  • Hautarztpraxis Dresden Germany
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
  • Klinikum Darmstadt (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Praxis für Dermatologie Memmingen Germany
  • Hautarztpraxis Heilbad Heiligenstadt Germany
  • Hautarztpraxis Panketal Germany
  • Novartis Pharma AG Basel Switzerland
  • Novartis (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Maurer, M.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-03-02
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
684-692
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2585403928
Cited by
131
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical & Experimental Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novartis Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Urticaria and Related Conditions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Keywords
chronic spontaneous urticaria, quality of life, angioedema, healthcare resource utilization, sick leave, comorbidities, urticaria control, pharmacotherapy, corticosteroids, second-generation antihistamines, chronic inducible urticaria
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Germany, Histamine H1 Antagonists, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Urticaria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review