Cited by 38Urticaria and Related ConditionsPrimary Care and Health OutcomesDermatology and Skin Diseases

Cost‐intensive, time‐consuming, problematical? How physicians in private practice experience the care of urticaria patients

Open access
Weller, Karsten, Viehmann, Kristina, Bräutigam, Matthias, Krause, Karoline, Siebenhaar, Frank, Zuberbier, Torsten, Maurer, Marcus·2012·JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft

Abstract

Summary: Background: Urticaria is a common and frequently debilitating disease. Nevertheless, there are only few studies examining the situation of urticaria patient care. Patients and Methods: In this cross‐sectional study, we surveyed dermatologists, pediatricians and general practitioners in the practice setting regarding the epidemiology, situation of care as well as the perception of their patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Results: 776 data sets were available. The results show a high frequency of consultations due to chronic spontaneous urticaria. Most of the patients were reported to suffer moderately to severely and to have had history of disease of well over one year. The pediatricians indicated fewer diseases and shorter courses. The majority of participants stated that the time and cost spent on care, as well as the frequency of follow‐up visits, are above average. In addition, chronic spontaneous urticaria patients were reported to be a group with a strong emotional burden and high expectations as well as a group that is difficult to satisfy and hard to guide. Only a small minority of physicians rated patient satisfaction with current treatment options and therapy success as high. Conclusions: Chronic spontaneous urticaria plays an important role in daily practice. Problems are reported on various areas of care. Resolving these problems presents a major challenge and is crucial for improving the quality of patient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07822.x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weller, K., Viehmann, K., Bräutigam, M., Krause, K., Siebenhaar, F., Zuberbier, T., & Maurer, M.
Affiliations
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Institute of Empirical Health Economics (DE)
  • Novartis (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Maurer, Marcus
Venue
JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-23
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
341-347
ISSN
  • 1610-0379 (ISSN-L)
  • 1610-0387
OpenAlex
W1800392482
Cited by
38
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JDDG Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Urticaria and Related Conditions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
chronic spontaneous urticaria, physician experience, dermatologists, pediatricians, general practitioners, consultation frequency, follow-up visits, emotional burden, patient satisfaction, treatment expectations, health care costs
MeSH terms
Dermatology, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Private Practice, Referral and Consultation, Urticaria, Prevalence, Workload, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review