Cited by 123Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesAdvanced Drug Delivery SystemsIntramuscular injections and effects

Novel approaches for the design, delivery and administration of vaccine technologies

Open access
Wallis, J, Shenton, D P, Carlisle, R C·2019·Clinical and Experimental Immunology

Abstract

Summary: It is easy to argue that vaccine development represents humankind’s most important and successful endeavour, such is the impact that vaccination has had on human morbidity and mortality over the last 200 years. During this time the original method of Jenner and Pasteur, i.e. that of injecting live-attenuated or inactivated pathogens, has been developed and supplemented with a wide range of alternative approaches which are now in clinical use or under development. These next-generation technologies have been designed to produce a vaccine that has the effectiveness of the original live-attenuated and inactivated vaccines, but without the associated risks and limitations. Indeed, the method of development has undoubtedly moved away from Pasteur’s three Is paradigm (isolate, inactivate, inject) towards an approach of rational design, made possible by improved knowledge of the pathogen–host interaction and the mechanisms of the immune system. These novel vaccines have explored methods for targeted delivery of antigenic material, as well as for the control of release profiles, so that dosing regimens can be matched to the time-lines of immune system stimulation and the realities of health-care delivery in dispersed populations. The methods by which vaccines are administered are also the subject of intense research in the hope that needle and syringe dosing, with all its associated issues regarding risk of injury, cross-infection and patient compliance, can be replaced. This review provides a detailed overview of new vaccine vectors as well as information pertaining to the novel delivery platforms under development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cei.13287

Cites

188 of 188 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improved antigen delivery methods such as liposomes, polymeric particles, inorganic particles, outer membrane vesicles, immunostimulating complexes, and self-assembling protein nanoparticles have the potential to optimally enhance and skew immune responses to pathogens against which traditional vaccine approaches have been unsuccessful.

    “These, and other methods such as self-assembling protein nanoparticles, have the potential to optimally enhance and skew the immune response to pathogens against which traditional vaccine approaches have proven to be unsuccessful129,134.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallis, J., Shenton, D. P., & Carlisle, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (GB)
Corresponding author
Wallis, J
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
Published
2019-04-08
Volume
196
Issue
2
Pages
189-204
ISSN
  • 0009-9104 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2249
OpenAlex
W2940118982
Cited by
123
References
188
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical & Experimental Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Oxford
  • EPSRC (EP/L024012/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (EP/L016494/1)
  • Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTLX-1000102376)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
Keywords
vaccine design, vaccine delivery, vaccine administration, live attenuated vaccine, inactivated vaccine, rational vaccine design, host-pathogen interaction, antigen delivery, controlled release, needle-free vaccination, vaccine vectors, dosing regimen
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Humans, Vaccination, Vaccines, Inactivated, Drug Delivery Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review