Cited by 19Estrogen and related hormone effectsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Impact of route of administration on genotoxic oestrogens concentrations using oral vs transdermal oestradiol in girls with Turner syndrome

Open access
Mauras, Nelly, Torres‐Santiago, Lournaris, Santen, Richard, Mericq, Veronica, Ross, Judith, Colon‐Otero, Gerardo, Damaso, Ligeia, Hossain, Jobayer +3 more·2019·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

Abstract Objective The established link between oestrogen and breast cancer occurs via both oestrogen receptor (ER)‐mediated and non ER‐mediated mechanisms. The term genotoxic estrogens describes mutagenic metabolites, including oestrogen catechols and quinones, which have been linked to breast carcinogenesis in post‐menopausal women. We aimed to assess whether the route of administration of 17β oestradiol (E2) affects the accumulation of genotoxic oestrogen metabolites in a model of ovarian failure in young girls with Turner syndrome. Methods Stored plasma samples obtained at 0 and 12 months were used from 40 adolescents with Turner syndrome who participated in a 12 months randomized controlled trial of the metabolic impact of E2 orally (2 mg/d) vs transdermally (100 µg/d); dose escalation allowed matching of unconjugated E2 levels in the parent study. We measured 12 oestrogen metabolites (total concentrations = conjugated and unconjugated) using a highly sensitive LCMSMS assay. Results from 48 normally menstruating adolescents were used for comparison. Results After treatment, least square mean (SE) total E2 concentrations were higher in the oral vs transdermal group (6784 pmol/L vs 1123 [1614], P < 0.0001), as was oestrone (E1) (91 060 pmol/L vs 19 278 [16 534], P < 0.0001). Also, higher after oral treatment were catechol‐oestrogens 4‐hydroxy‐E2 (149 vs 28 [±49] pmol/L), 2‐hydroxy‐E2 (300 vs 76 [±52]), 4‐hydroxy‐E1 (450 vs 105 [±113]), 2‐hydroxy‐E1 (3094 vs 740 [±684]) and 16α‐hydroxy‐E1 (3,007 vs 157 [±534]) (<0.001 between groups). Levels were much closer to controls in the transdermal group. Conclusions Common feminizing doses of oral oestradiol for 12 months result in substantial accumulation of unphysiologic, genotoxic oestrogens compared to transdermal oestradiol, expanding concerns about oral oestrogens’ first hepatic passage. Further studies assessing long‐term risks of these metabolites in women taking different forms of oestrogen are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cen.13869

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A randomized controlled trial comparing the metabolic impact of oral E2 versus transdermal E2 found that oral administration resulted in a disproportionate, significant accumulation of genotoxic estrogens compared with transdermal administration.

    “A RCT comparing the metabolic impact of oral E2 versus TD E2, found that oral administration resulted in a disproportionate, significant accumulation of genotoxic estrogens compared with TD administration.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mauras, N., Torres‐Santiago, L., Santen, R., Mericq, V., Ross, J., Colon‐Otero, G., Damaso, L., Hossain, J., Wang, Q., Mesaros, C., & Blair, I. A.
Affiliations
  • Nemours Children's Health System (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Division of Endocrinology, Institute of Maternal and Child Research University of Chile Santiago Chile
  • Division of Hematology &amp; Oncology Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Florida
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Mauras, Nelly
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-25
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
155-161
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2895048528
Cited by
19
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Genentech Foundation for Biomedical Sciences (NA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Keywords
Turner syndrome, estradiol, route of administration, transdermal estradiol, estrone, ovarian failure, breast cancer risk, feminizing hormone therapy, adolescents
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Chromatography, Liquid, Estradiol, Estrogens, Female, Humans, Mutagens, Turner Syndrome, Treatment Outcome, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review