Cited by 569Menopause: Health Impacts and TreatmentsVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis

Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Canonico, Marianne, Plu-Bureau, Geneviève, Lowe, Gordon D O, Scarabin, Pierre-Yves·2008·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism in women using hormone replacement therapy by study design, characteristics of the therapy and venous thromboembolism, and clinical background. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline. STUDIES REVIEWED: Eight observational studies and nine randomised controlled trials. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies on hormone replacement therapy that reported venous thromboembolism. REVIEW MEASURES: Homogeneity between studies was analysed using chi(2) and I(2) statistics. Overall risk of venous thromboembolism was assessed from a fixed effects or random effects model. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of observational studies showed that oral oestrogen but not transdermal oestrogen increased the risk of venous thromboembolism. Compared with non-users of oestrogen, the odds ratio of first time venous thromboembolism in current users of oral oestrogen was 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 3.4) and in current users of transdermal oestrogen was 1.2 (0.9 to 1.7). Past users of oral oestrogen had a similar risk of venous thromboembolism to never users. The risk of venous thromboembolism in women using oral oestrogen was higher in the first year of treatment (4.0, 2.9 to 5.7) compared with treatment for more than one year (2.1, 1.3 to 3.8; P<0.05). No noticeable difference in the risk of venous thromboembolism was observed between unopposed oral oestrogen (2.2, 1.6 to 3.0) and opposed oral oestrogen (2.6, 2.0 to 3.2). Results from nine randomised controlled trials confirmed the increased risk of venous thromboembolism among women using oral oestrogen (2.1, 1.4 to 3.1). The combination of oral oestrogen and thrombogenic mutations or obesity further enhanced the risk of venous thromboembolism, whereas transdermal oestrogen did not seem to confer additional risk in women at high risk of venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSION: Oral oestrogen increases the risk of venous thromboembolism, especially during the first year of treatment. Transdermal oestrogen may be safer with respect to thrombotic risk. More data are required to investigate differences in risk across the wide variety of hormone regimens, especially the different types of progestogens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.39555.441944.be

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increasing risk of VTE with duration of estrogen use in transgender women contrasts with menopausal hormone therapy, where risk is highest in the first year and decreases with time.

    “The increasing risk of VTE with duration of estrogen use is in contrast with menopausal hormonal therapy, where the risk is highest in the first year of use and decreases with time. [122]”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [122]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12.
  2. Fleiss JL. The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1993;2:121-45.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Canonico, M., Plu-Bureau, G., Lowe, G. D. O., & Scarabin, P.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Canonico, Marianne
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2008-05-20
Volume
336
Issue
7655
Pages
1227-1231
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2008660261
Cited by
569
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 35
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Keywords
hormone replacement therapy, venous thromboembolism, postmenopausal women, oral estrogen, transdermal estrogen, obesity, unopposed estrogen, progestogens, thrombosis risk, treatment duration
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Administration, Oral, Female, Humans, Risk, Risk Factors, Estrogen Replacement Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Postmenopause, Venous Thromboembolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review