Cited by 77Congenital Heart Disease StudiesCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesCardiovascular Conditions and Treatments

Cerebral tissue oxygenation index and lactate at 24 hours postoperative predict survival and neurodevelopmental outcome after neonatal cardiac surgery: Cerebral TOI and Neurodevelopmental Outcome

Aly, Safwat A., Zurakowski, David, Glass, Penny, Skurow-Todd, Kami, Jonas, Richard A., Donofrio, Mary T.·2017·Congenital Heart Disease

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: There are no well-established noninvasive biomarkers for identifying patients at risk for poor outcome after surgery for congenital heart disease. Few studies have assessed prognostic accuracy of cerebral tissue oxygenation index (cTOI) measured by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of noninvasive NIRS monitoring as a predictor of outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery through measurement of cTOI. To examine the utility of noninvasive NIRS monitoring in combination with lactate concentration and inotropic score in prediction of outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Operating room and cardiac intensive care unit, Children's National Heart Institute. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-five patients with complex congenital heart disease undergoing surgical repair within first month of life. EXPOSURE: Cerebral TOI, blood lactate, and inotropic scores were measured preoperative, intraoperative and up to 24 hours postoperative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative mortality and neurodevelopmental outcome assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID II). Mental and motor scores were obtained at 6, 15, and 21 months. Good outcome was defined as survival and BSID mental and motor scores ≥70 points. Poor outcome was defined as death or BSID scores <70 at most recent follow-up. RESULTS: Cohort of 75 patients prospectively followed including 40 patients with single ventricle and 35 with two ventricles. Four patients died before discharge and ten died within 21 months. Seven patients were lost to follow-up. Among survivors with follow-up (n = 54), BSID was abnormal in 25 (46%). Patients with poor outcome (n = 39) had lower mean cTOI 60 minutes off-CPB (48% vs. 58%, P = .003) and 24 hours postoperative (49% vs. 59%, P < .001), higher lactate (8.2 vs. 5.0 mmol/L, P = .005) and higher inotropic scores (10 vs. 6, P = .02) at 24 hours postoperative. ROC analysis indicated that cTOI had moderate predictive accuracy of outcome (AUC = 0.751, P < .001). Multivariable regression analysis confirmed that predictive accuracy was improved using both cTOI and lactate at 24 hours postoperative (AUC = 0.813, 95% CI: 0.705-0.921, P < .001) with optimal cutoff values <58% and >7.4 mmol/L, respectively (sensitivity = 95%). CONCLUSION: Cerebral TOI combined with lactate at 24 hours postoperative are accurate non-invasive predictive biomarkers of patient survival and neurodevelopmental outcome in neonates with CHD undergoing cardiac surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/chd.12426

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aly et al. reported that a cerebral oxygen saturation threshold of <58%, when combined with a lactate concentration > 7.4 mmol/L at 24 h post-neonatal cardiac surgery, served as a reliable predictor of survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

    “Aly et al. reported that a cerebral oxygen saturation threshold of <58%, when combined with a lactate concentration > 7.4 mmol/L at 24 h post-neonatal cardiac surgery, served as a reliable predictor of survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes [66].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aly, S. A., Zurakowski, D., Glass, P., Skurow-Todd, K., Jonas, R. A., & Donofrio, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Children's National (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Aly, Safwat A.
Venue
Congenital Heart Disease
Published
2016-11-10
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
188-195
ISSN
1747-079X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556567402
Cited by
77
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Congenital Heart Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CreFF Grant from Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
  • Saving Tiny Hearts Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments
Keywords
near-infrared spectroscopy, neonatal cardiac surgery, blood lactate, inotropic score, neurodevelopmental outcomes, postoperative mortality, single ventricle, prognostic factors, cardiopulmonary bypass, Bayley Scales of Infant Development, non-invasive monitoring, outcome prediction model
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Brain, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Child Development, District of Columbia, Heart Defects, Congenital, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Motor Activity, Nervous System, Oxygen, Oxygen Consumption, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Sympathomimetics, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Hospital Mortality, Infant Behavior, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Lactic Acid, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review