The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists
Abstract
Natural scientists are increasingly interested in social research because they recognize that conservation problems are commonly social problems. Interpreting social research, however, requires at least a basic understanding of the philosophical principles and theoretical assumptions of the discipline, which are embedded in the design of social research. Natural scientists who engage in social science but are unfamiliar with these principles and assumptions can misinterpret their results. We developed a guide to assist natural scientists in understanding the philosophical basis of social science to support the meaningful interpretation of social research outcomes. The 3 fundamental elements of research are ontology, what exists in the human world that researchers can acquire knowledge about; epistemology, how knowledge is created; and philosophical perspective, the philosophical orientation of the researcher that guides her or his action. Many elements of the guide also apply to the natural sciences. Natural scientists can use the guide to assist them in interpreting social science research to determine how the ontological position of the researcher can influence the nature of the research; how the epistemological position can be used to support the legitimacy of different types of knowledge; and how philosophical perspective can shape the researcher's choice of methods and affect interpretation, communication, and application of results. The use of this guide can also support and promote the effective integration of the natural and social sciences to generate more insightful and relevant conservation research outcomes. Una Guía para Entender la Investigación de Ciencias Sociales para las Ciencias Naturales Katie Moon
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Creswell, J. W. (1994) · Cited by 35,204
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
Qualitative research & evaluation methods
Patton, M. Q. (2002) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 15,523
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
Sloane-Seale, A. (2009) · Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education · doi:10.21225/d54s3d · Cited by 14,328
(2010) · Sociology for Pharmacists · doi:10.4324/9780203381175_chapter_9 · Cited by 14,152
The SAGE handbook of qualitative research
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-1330 · Cited by 10,183
(1998) · Cited by 9,332
Handbook of qualitative research
Griffin, T. F. (1999) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199907)16:4<371::aid-mar7>3.0.co;2-k · Cited by 9,037
Bruner, J. (1986) · doi:10.4159/9780674029019 · Cited by 8,657
Handbook of Qualitative Research.
Fine, G. A., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076550 · Cited by 7,766
Cited by
Breaking Through Disciplinary Barriers: Human–Wildlife Interactions and Multispecies Ethnography
Parathian, H. E., McLennan, M. R., Hill, C. M., Frazão-Moreira, A., & Hockings, K. J. (2018) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-018-0027-9 · Cited by 62
Participant experiences in the Diabetes REmission Clinical Trial (DiRECT)
Rehackova, L., Rodrigues, A. M., Thom, G., Brosnahan, N., Barnes, A. C., McCombie, L., Leslie, W. S., Zhyzhneuskaya, S., Peters, C., Adamson, A. J., et al. (2022) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.14689 · Cited by 46
Customizations and Expression Breakdowns in Ecosystems of Communication Apps
Griggio, C. F., McGrenere, J., & Mackay, W. E. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359128 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- MOON, K., & BLACKMAN, D.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06-24
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1167-1177
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W1902841288
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 117.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/cobi.12326
- The paper
- MOON, K., & BLACKMAN, D. (2014). A Guide to Understanding Social Science Research for Natural Scientists. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.