Cited by 47Diabetes Management and EducationDietary Effects on HealthDiabetes Management and Research

Participant experiences in the Diabetes REmission Clinical Trial (DiRECT)

Open access
Rehackova, Lucia, Rodrigues, Angela Margarete, Thom, George, Brosnahan, Naomi, Barnes, Alison C., McCombie, Louise, Leslie, Wilma S., Zhyzhneuskaya, Sviatlana +5 more·2022·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: The Diabetes REmission Clinical Trial (DiRECT) has shown that sustained remission of type 2 diabetes in primary care is achievable through weight loss using total diet replacement (TDR) with continued behavioural support. Understanding participants’ experiences can help optimise the intervention, support implementation into healthcare, and understand the process of behaviour change. Methods: Thirty‐four DiRECT participants were recruited into this embedded qualitative evaluation study. In‐person and telephone interviews were conducted before the TDR; at week 6–8 of the TDR; 2 weeks into food reintroduction (FR); and at 1 year, to learn about participant experiences with the programme. Transcribed narratives were analysed thematically, and we used interpretation to develop overarching themes. Results: Initiation of the TDR and transition to FR were challenging and required increased behavioural support. In general, adhering to TDR proved easier than the participants had anticipated. Some participants chose the optional extension of TDR. Rapid weight loss and changes in diabetes markers provided ongoing motivation. Further weight loss, behavioural support and occasional use of TDR facilitated weight loss maintenance (WLM). A process of behaviour adaptation to change following regime disruption was identified in three stages: (1) expectations of the new, (2) overcoming difficulties with adherence, and (3) acceptance of continuous effort and establishment of routines. Conclusions: The DiRECT intervention was acceptable and regularity, continuity, and tailoring of behavioural support was instrumental in its implementation in primary care. The adaptation process accounts for some of the individual variability of experiences with the intervention and highlights the need for programme flexibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/dme.14689

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Weight loss may not be the goal for some patients, and many people are actively seeking to reduce the number of medications that they take.

    “Weight loss may not be the goal for some patients, and many people are actively seeking to reduce the number of medications that they take.”

    From The societal implications of using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [64]

    The ‘Expectations of the total diet replacement’ section (page unavailable) reports that the prospect of not taking medication encouraged participation, and quotes a participant hoping to stop metformin. The Conclusions (page unavailable) also describe freedom from diabetes medication as an attraction. The paper does not establish that weight loss was not a goal for some participants or that many people generally seek to reduce the number of medications they take. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rehackova, L., Rodrigues, A. M., Thom, G., Brosnahan, N., Barnes, A. C., McCombie, L., Leslie, W. S., Zhyzhneuskaya, S., Peters, C., Adamson, A. J., Lean, M. E. J., Taylor, R., & Sniehotta, F. F.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Rehackova, Lucia
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-09-18
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
e14689-e14689
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W3200679388
Cited by
46
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Funders
Diabetes UK
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes remission, total diet replacement, weight loss, behavioral support, participant experiences, food reintroduction, weight loss maintenance, behavior change, intervention adherence, primary care, DIRECT trial
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Weight Loss, Caloric Restriction, Qualitative Research, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review