The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Achieving cost‐effective landscape‐scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration
Open accessAbstract
High costs of tree planting are a barrier to meeting global forest restoration targets. Natural forest regeneration is more cost‐effective than tree planting, but its potential to foster restoration at scale is poorly understood. We predict, map, and quantify natural regeneration potential within 75.5 M ha of deforested lands in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Of 34.1 M ha (26.4%) of current forest cover, 2.7 M ha (8.0%) regenerated naturally from 1996 to 2015. We estimate that another 2.8 M ha could naturally regenerate by 2035, and a further 18.8 M ha could be restored using assisted regeneration methods, thereby reducing implementation costs by US$ 90.6 billion (77%) compared to tree planting. These restored forests could sequester 2.3 GtCO 2 of carbon, reduce the mean number of expected species at risk of extinction by 63.4, and reduce fragmentation by 44% compared to current levels. Natural regeneration planning is key for achieving cost‐effective large‐scale restoration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31788-4 · Cited by 10,880
Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests
Poorter, L., Bongers, F., Aide, T. M., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Balvanera, P., Becknell, J. M., Boukili, V., Brancalion, P. H. S., Broadbent, E. N., Chazdon, R. L., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16512 · Cited by 1,210
Self-citationSoares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Macedo, M., Carneiro, A., Costa, W., Coe, M., Rodrigues, H., & Alencar, A. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246663 · Cited by 1,133
Crouzeilles, R., Ferreira, M. S., Chazdon, R. L., Lindenmayer, D. B., Sansevero, J. B. B., Monteiro, L., Iribarrem, A., Latawiec, A. E., & Strassburg, B. B. N. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1701345 · Cited by 705
Self-citationChazdon, R. L., & Guariguata, M. R. (2016) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/btp.12381 · Cited by 694
Self-citationArroyo-Rodríguez, V., Melo, F. P. L., Martínez-Ramos, M., Bongers, F., Chazdon, R. L., Meave, J. A., Norden, N., Santos, B. A., Leal, I. R., & Tabarelli, M. (2017) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12231 · Cited by 688
Self-citationA global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success
Crouzeilles, R., Curran, M., Ferreira, M. S., Lindenmayer, D. B., Grelle, C. E. V., & Rey Benayas, J. M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11666 · Cited by 652
Self-citationSecond Growth: The Promise of Tropical Forest Regeneration in an Age of Deforestation
Chazdon, R. L. (2014) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226118109.001.0001 · Cited by 587
Self-citationBanks-Leite, C., Pardini, R., Tambosi, L. R., Pearse, W. D., Bueno, A. A., Bruscagin, R. T., Condez, T. H., Dixo, M., Igari, A. T., Martensen, A. C., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1255768 · Cited by 498
Global restoration opportunities in tropical rainforest landscapes
Brancalion, P. H. S., Niamir, A., Broadbent, E., Crouzeilles, R., Barros, F. S. M., Almeyda Zambrano, A. M., Baccini, A., Aronson, J., Goetz, S., Reid, J. L., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav3223 · Cited by 493
Self-citation
Cited by
Di Sacco, A., Hardwick, K. A., Blakesley, D., Brancalion, P. H. S., Breman, E., Cecilio Rebola, L., Chomba, S., Dixon, K., Elliott, S., Ruyonga, G., et al. (2021) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15498 · Cited by 728
Chazdon, R. L., Lindenmayer, D., Guariguata, M. R., Crouzeilles, R., Rey Benayas, J. M., & Lazos Chavero, E. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab79e6 · Cited by 258
Self-citationThe intervention continuum in restoration ecology: rethinking the active–passive dichotomy
Chazdon, R. L., Falk, D. A., Banin, L. F., Wagner, M., J. Wilson, S., Grabowski, R. C., & Suding, K. N. (2024) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.13535 · Cited by 204
Self-citationOld-growth forest loss and secondary forest recovery across Amazonian countries
Smith, C. C., Healey, J. R., Berenguer, E., Young, P. J., Taylor, B., Elias, F., Espírito-Santo, F., & Barlow, J. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac1701 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Crouzeilles, R., Beyer, H. L., Monteiro, L. M., Feltran-Barbieri, R., Pessôa, A. C. M., Barros, F. S. M., Lindenmayer, D. B., Lino, E. D. S. M., Grelle, C. E. V., Chazdon, R. L., Matsumoto, M., Rosa, M., Latawiec, A. E., & Strassburg, B. B. N.
- Venue
- Conservation Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-02-18
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 1755-263X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3008750029
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Achieving cost‐effective landscape‐scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/conl.12709
- The paper
- Crouzeilles, R., Beyer, H. L., Monteiro, L. M., Feltran-Barbieri, R., Pessôa, A. C. M., Barros, F. S. M., Lindenmayer, D. B., Lino, E. D. S. M., Grelle, C. E. V., Chazdon, R. L., Matsumoto, M., Rosa, M., Latawiec, A. E., & Strassburg, B. B. N. (2020). Achieving cost‐effective landscape‐scale forest restoration through targeted natural regeneration. Conservation Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
