Cited by 22Personality Disorders and PsychopathologySubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Emotional dysregulation as a target in the treatment of co-existing substance use and borderline personality disorders: a pilot study

Open access
Hall, Kate, Simpson, Angela, O'donnell, Renee, Sloan, Elise, Staiger, Petra K., Morton, Jane, Ryan, Deirdre, Nunn, Brogan +2 more·2018·Clinical Psychologist

Abstract

BackgroundBorderline personality disorder (BPD) and substance use disorders (SUD) are frequently co‐morbid and their co‐occurrence exacerbates the symptomatology and associated harms for both disorders. However, few intervention studies have examined the delivery of an integrated intervention for BPD and SUD within alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment settings. This single arm pilot study examined the clinical utility and outcomes of a 12‐session emotion regulation intervention for clients with co‐occurring SUD and BPD symptoms delivered in an outpatient AOD treatment setting.MethodForty‐five adult treatment‐seekers (64.4% women, mean age 35.8 years (SD = 10.4)) attending an outpatient AOD service, who exhibited three or more symptoms of BPD, engaged in a 12‐session emotion regulation intervention. Clinical measures assessing alcohol and drug use, BPD symptoms, emotion dysregulation and acceptance, non‐avoidance of thoughts and emotions, and psychological flexibility were collected at baseline, session 6 and session 12. Treatment engagement, satisfaction, and rapport were also measured.ResultsFifty‐one percent of participants completed the 12‐session intervention. The results demonstrated that the number of drugs using occasions in the past 28 days significantly reduced from baseline compared to session 12. Furthermore, a significant reduction was identified in BPD symptom severity, emotion dysregulation, and non‐acceptance, experiential avoidance, and psychological inflexibility from baseline to session 12.ConclusionsFor those individuals who completed the 12‐session emotion regulation intervention, there were significant reductions across a number of clinical outcomes. However, retention in treatment for this vulnerable client group remains a significant challenge in the AOD setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cp.12162

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current findings lend support to transdiagnostic interventions designed to target low distress tolerance for individuals with impulsive-type psychopathology.

    “Therefore, while the current findings lend support to the recent development of transdiagnostic interventions designed to target low DT for individuals with impulsive-type psychopathology (e.g., Hall et al., 2018Hall et al., , 2021;;Ritschel et al., 2015), they also suggest that such interventions may need to be combined with disorder-specific interventions.”
  • ERIC is an emotion regulation and impulse control modular CBT skills-based program, which was developed through a 3-year participatory research program in partnership with vulnerable young people and youth services across Australia.

    “ERIC is an emotion regulation and impulse control modular CBT skills-based program, which was developed through a 3-year participatory research program in partnership with vulnerable young people and youth services across Australia (Hall and Simpson, 2018).”
  • The attrition rates in the current study were comparable to other studies of treatment seekers with polysubstance use and psychosocial complexity.

    “Indeed, the attrition rates in the current study were comparable to other studies of treatment seekers with polysubstance use (e.g., Hall et al., 2018) and psychosocial complexity (Ferguson et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, K., Simpson, A., O'donnell, R., Sloan, E., Staiger, P. K., Morton, J., Ryan, D., Nunn, B., Best, D., & Lubman, D. I.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Centre for Drug Use, Addictive and Anti‐social Behaviour Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia,
  • Private Practice, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
  • Eastern Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Hall, Kate
Venue
Clinical Psychologist
Published
2018-07-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
112-125
ISSN
  • 1328-4207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-9552
OpenAlex
W2810754628
Cited by
22
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, substance use disorders, co-occurring disorders, emotional dysregulation, emotion regulation interventions, acceptance and commitment therapy, psychological flexibility, experiential avoidance, alcohol and other drug treatment, treatment retention, outpatient addiction services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review