Cited by 129Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Psychosocial Treatment for Methamphetamine Use Disorders: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial of Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Smout, Matthew F., Longo, Marie, Harrison, Sonia, Minniti, Rinaldo, Wickes, Wendy, White, Jason M.·2010·Substance Abuse

Abstract

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) incorporates developments in behavior therapy, holds promise but has not been evaluated for methamphetamine use disorders. The objective of this study was to test whether ACT would increase treatment attendance and reduce methamphetamine use and related harms compared to cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). One hundred and four treatment-seeking adults with methamphetamine abuse or dependence were randomly assigned to receive 12 weekly 60-minute individual sessions of ACT or CBT. Attrition was 70% at 12 weeks and 86% at 24 weeks postentry. Per intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the treatment groups in treatment attendance (median 3 sessions), and methamphetamine-related outcomes; however, methamphetamine use (toxicology-assessed and self-reported), negative consequences, and dependence severity significantly improved over time in both groups. Although ACT did not improve treatment outcomes or attendance compared to CBT, it may be a viable alternative to CBT for methamphetamine use disorders. Future rigorous research in this area seems warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08897071003641578

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smout, M. F., Longo, M., Harrison, S., Minniti, R., Wickes, W., & White, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Treatment of Anxiety Disorders, Thebarton, South Australia, Australia
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Drug and Alcohol Services South Australia, Warinilla Clinic, Norwood, South Australia, Australia
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Smout, Matthew F.
Venue
Substance Abuse
Published
2010-04
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
98-107
ISSN
  • 0889-7077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0164
OpenAlex
W2171048870
Cited by
129
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Substance Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
methamphetamine dependence, acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychosocial interventions, treatment attendance, treatment discontinuation, substance use harm, treatment-seeking patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Assertiveness, Behavior Therapy, Female, Hair, Humans, Male, Methamphetamine, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Amphetamine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review